Clinical comparison of three different cross-leg flaps for coverage of serious soft tissue defects on the ;lower leg

Shulin LI,Jiuzhou LU,Junjian JIANG,Lei XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8573.2016.01.007
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the three different cross?leg flaps for repairing the serious tissue de?fect of the leg. Methods The clinical data of 35 patients with exposure wounds on the leg treated by cross?leg flap were analyzed retrospectively. Ten cases with the posterior tibial vascular bundle of the posterior tibial ar?tery and the lateral femoral skin flap were included in the lateral femoral flap group. Fifteen cases with the trans?fer of the gastrocnemius nerve nutrient flap were included in the gastrocnemius nerve nutrient flap group. Ten cases with medial leg perforator flap were included in the medial leg perforator flap group. The survival rate of skin flaps and the supply area of the three groups were compared. Results Thirty?four cases survived com?pletely, and 1 cases survived partly. There was one case of infection in the lateral femoral flap group, 4 cases of venous crisis and 2 case of infection in the gastrocnemius nerve nutrient flap group, and 1 case of arterial crisis in the medial leg perforator flap group. There were no significant differences in survival rate of the flaps among the groups, but the condition of the supply area among the groups had significant differences. The rate of skin grafting in the lateral femoral flap group was lower than in the other two groups. Conclusion These three meth?ods of the cross?leg flap are safe and good way for repairing the soft tissue defects of the leg with reduced injury of supply area at the same time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?