Comparison between non-fusion and fusion internal fixation with posterior pedicle screw for odontoid fracture
Shengjie Wang,Jiwei Tian,Zhenghong Yu,Kun Gao,Jia Shao,Jiantao Liu,Dongbo Lyu,Yanzheng Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2019.08.009
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of non-fusion and fusion internal fixation with posterior pedicle screw for odontoid fractures. Methods A retrospective case control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 46 patients with odontoid fractures admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015. There were 35 males and 11 females, aged 19-62 years [(36. 9 ± 1. 6)years]. The preoperative odontoid fractures were classified as type IIA in five patients, type IIB in eight, type IIC in 22, shallow type III in six according to Anderson and D'Alonzo typing. The fractures of five patients were not classified. According to the ASIA grading, the preoperative spinal cord function was graded as D or E in the 46 patients. Among the patients, 15 underwent posterior pedicle screw non-fusion internal fixation ( Group A) , with 60 pedicle screws removed 12-29 months after operation. A total of 31 patients were treated with fusion internal fixation with posterior pedicle screw ( Group B) , with 124 pedicle screws free from removal after operation. The follow-up time, operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, intraoperative blood loss as well as visual analog scale (VAS), cervical rotation degree, and neck disability index ( NDI) before operation, 1 year after surgery ( when no internal fixation was removed ) and at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in the follow-up time, operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, intraoperative blood loss, VAS score, neck rotation degree, NDI score before operation and at 1 year after operation (P >0. 05). There were significant differences between two groups in VAS scores, neck rotation degree, NDI scores indicating driving and walking and recreational activities at the last follow-up ( P <0. 05 ) . There were no significant differences between two groups in other NDI scores items, including neck discomfort, personal care, lifting heavy objects, reading & watching TV, headache situation, attention, working status, and sleep disorder at the last follow-up ( P> 0. 05 ) . Conclusions Posterior pedicle screw internal fixation for odontoid process fracture has good curative effect. Non-fusion internal fixation with posterior pedicle screw is more conducive to the recovery of cervical spine rotation function, the relief of neck and back pain, and the improvement of patients' driving, walking and entertainment activities.