Biofeedback electrical stimulation for treatment of urinary incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Xiao Heng-jun,Gao Xin,Cai Yu-bin,Zhou Xiang-fu,Qiu Jian-guang,Wen Xing-qiao,Zhou Jian-hua,Liu Xiao-peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.09.044
2008-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the efficacy of biofeedback electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training in the treatment of urinary incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent LRP in Department of Urinary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from July 2005 to June 2007 were selected, including 12 with mild disease, 23 with moderate and 6 with severe. The patients were treated by UROSTIM biofeedback electrical stimulation (Laborie, Canada), once per day for five times and pelvic floor muscle training. One or two courses of treatment were performed according to the degree of urinary incontinence. Therapeutic outcome was assessed 4 weeks after treatment according to the criteria: recovery if self-conscious urinary incontinence disappeared, urine was controllable, urination was normal, and urinal pad test was negative; effective, if self-conscious urinary incontinence significantly decreased, and urinal pad test was negative for more than 3 successive times; ineffective, if urinary incontinence was not improved, and urinal pad test was positive. The patients were followed up for 3 to 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, the total efficacy rate was 83% (34/41), curative rate was 56.1% (23/41), efficacy rate 26.9% (11/41) and ineffective rate 17.0% (7/41). Of the cases with mild urinary incontinence, 11 were cured and 1 was effectively improved; of the cases with moderate urinary incontinence, 11 were cured and 8 were significantly improved; of the cases with server urinary incontinence, 1 was cured, 2 were improved, and 3 were failed. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback electrical stimulation can facilitate rehabilitation of urinary control after prostatectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?