Abstract:Trabecular bone has been reported as having two-dimensional (2-D) fractal characteristics at the histological level, a finding correlated with biomechanical properties. However, several fractal dimensions (D) are known and computational ways to obtain them vary considerably. This study compared three algorithms on the same series of bone biopsies, to obtain the Kolmogorov, Minkowski-Bouligand, and mass-radius fractal dimensions. The relationships with histomorphometric descriptors of the 2-D trabecular architecture were investigated. Bone biopsies were obtained from 148 osteoporotic male patients. Bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular characteristics (Tb.N, Tb.Sp, Tb.Th), strut analysis, star volumes (marrow spaces and trabeculae), inter-connectivity index, and Euler-Poincaré number were computed. The box-counting method was used to obtain the Kolmogorov dimension (D(k)), the dilatation method for the Minkowski-Bouligand dimension (D(MB)), and the sandbox for the mass-radius dimension (D(MR)) and lacunarity (L). Logarithmic relationships were observed between BV/TV and the fractal dimensions. The best correlation was obtained with D(MR) and the lowest with D(MB). Lacunarity was correlated with descriptors of the marrow cavities (ICI, star volume, Tb.Sp). Linear relationships were observed among the three fractal techniques which appeared highly correlated. A cluster analysis of all histomorphometric parameters provided a tree with three groups of descriptors: for trabeculae (Tb.Th, strut); for marrow cavities (Euler, ICI, Tb.Sp, star volume, L); and for the complexity of the network (Tb.N and the three D's). A sole fractal dimension cannot be used instead of the classic 2-D descriptors of architecture; D rather reflects the complexity of branching trabeculae. Computation time is also an important determinant when choosing one of these methods.

Volume fractal dimensionality: a useful parameter for measuring the complexity of 3D protein spatial structures.

Comparing 3-D Protein Structures Similarity by Using Fractal Features

3D Protein Structures Similarity Matching Based on Fractal Features

A New Approach for Examining the Similarity of Protein 3D Shape

Direct Volume Rendering of Volumetric Protein Data

Three-Dimensional Quantification of Fiber-Like Structures in Biological Tissues

Automated Quantification of Three-Dimensional Organization of Fiber-Like Structures in Biological Tissues.

Fractai Analysis on Protein-Protein Interaction Networks

A Method for Measuring Protein Structure Similarity Based on the Molecular Inner Spatial Density Distribution

Volumetric Visualization And Analysis Of Molecular Interaction Field

Protein 3d Features and Surface Modeling Research

Universal geometrical factor of protein conformations as a consequence of energy minimization

Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity

A similarity computing algorithm for volumetric data sets

Dimension Conversion and Scaling of Disordered Protein Chains

Relationship Between Structural Fractal and Possible Dynamic Scaling Properties in Protein Folding

Atomic Scale Fractal Dimensionality in Proteins

Research on the Box Counting Algorithm in Fractal Dimension Measurement

Sphractal: Estimating the Fractal Dimension of Surfaces Computed from Precise Atomic Coordinates via Box-Counting Algorithm

Geometric structures of proteins for understanding folding , discriminating natives and predicting biochemical functions

About the Protein Space Vastness