Abstract:In the instant case between China and Japan in the East China Sea, right or title to continental shelf is the central issue of dispute. The law on continental shelf has evolved, from the natural prolongation principle confirmed in North Sea Continental Shelf Case in 1969, to a rule more favorably considering "distance criterion". Therefore, it is necessary to take the time factor into account. Time factor can be approached from three perspectives, that is, critical date, inter-temporal law and contemporary law. Critical date is the date when the dispute was given rise to with a concrete issue. Inter-temporal law should be considered when legal relationship had been constructed before the change of the law, and contemporary law applies only when legal relationship was constructed after the change of the law. The mere fact that Sino-Japanese dispute over East China Sea has long before emerged indicates that the time factor in the dispute is not simply a contemporary law question as Japan asserts. The critical date in this dispute can be dated back to 1974 when China protested the Japanese-South Korean continental shelf agreement. If so, the changes in the law and fact after 1974 would be excluded and the applicable law should be the principle of natural prolongation. Moreover, if the critical date is deemed to be the year of 1996, when conflicting claims on the legal basis on continental shelf became distinct, inter-temporal law needs to be discussed. In such a case, if the change in law (incorporating distance criterion) is merely a treaty rule of UNCLOS, non-retroactivity principle in the law of treaties would neatly determine the application of natural prolongation principle established in previous law. In case that the change in law is an alleged customary rule emerged around the year of 1982, were this subsequent law applied, a reasonable long period of time from the previous law would have been required. It is impossible in the present case to draw a conclusion that the evolution of the law on continental shelf over just twelve years (1969-1982) could be reasonably taken as a long period of time. Therefore, even critical date were to be set in the year of 1996, the applicable law is still natural prolongation principle.

American Foreign Policy and the Establishment of Continental Shelf Regime

China's Land-Sea Coordination Practice in Territorial Spatial Planning

The United States of America and the Geneva Conference of 1947--on the Establishment of GATT Regime and American Commercial Hegemony

Literature and Arguments concerning Continental Shelf Delimitation in Japanese International Law Academia

New developments and trends in extended continental shelf delineation practices-An analysis of China's participation and response strategies

Law of the Sea Issues Between the United States and East Asian States

The Significance of Natural Prolongation Principle in the East China Sea Dispute between China and Japan——Perspective from the Relationship between Institution of Right and Rule of Delimitation

On the Function of Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) in the Delimitation of the Outer Continental Shelf:also Commenting on the Outer Continental Shelf Applications of China and the Surrounding Coastal States

Principles and methods for the submission consideration of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf —— Cases study of recommendations summary made by the Commission

Maritime Legislation of Mainland China and Taiwan: Developments, Comparison, Implications, and Potential Challenges for the United States

Maritime Rights and Interests,Economy and Integration Management

The Unity Status of Continental States’ Outlying Archipelagos

China’s Peaceful Development: The Return and Development of the Continental Powers

Technologies and Their Application for the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles

The Biden Administration's South China Sea Policy from the Perspective of Indo-Pacific Strategy:Power, Rules, and Order

A Geopolitical Analysis of America's Involvement in the South China Sea Issue

America's Policy Toward Germany under the GATT Regime (1948-1951)

Freedom of navigation and peaceful uses of the seas: UNCLOS, Chinese perspectives and personal thoughts

Revisiting the ICJ’s 1985 Libya/Malta case and the Primacy of the Distance Criterion under the Continental Shelf Regime: Implications and Prospects for the 1974 Korea-Japan Joint Development Agreement and the East China Sea

Time Factor in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over East China Sea: the Critical Date and Inter-temporal Law

Preliminary Considerations on the Potential Influence of Submarine Fans on Marine Delimitation