Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in definition of tumor invasion depth staging (T staging) before operation.METHODS:Clinical and radiographic data of 49 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection within two weeks after 3.0 T high-resolution MRI examination without preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Peking University People's Hospital between February 2015 and November 2015 were retrospectively collected. Two radiologists reviewed the MRI imagines and evaluated the location and T staging of rectal cancer independently(radiologist A and B). The kappa statistics was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement, and kappa value greater than 0.81 indicated excellent agreement. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution MRI in definition of rectal cancer T staging were assessed with pathological result as golden standard.RESULTS:According to pathological result of 49 rectal cancer patients, 3 were pT1, 17 were pT2, 22 were pT3, and 7 were pT4a. In 2 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed focal or diffuse significantly higher signal close to perirectal fat. And in other 47 patients of non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed equal or higher signal compared with pelvic muscle. Interobserver agreement was excellent in diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer with 3.0T high-resolution MRI(Kappa=0.87). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T1 staging was 95.9%(47/49), 1/3 and 100%(46/46) respectively, besides, 1 case was both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. For 2 radiologists, the accuracy of T2 staging was 87.8%(43/49) and 91.8%(45/49) respectively, the sensitivity was both 88.2%(15/17), and the specificity was 87.5%(28/32) and 93.5%(30/32) respectively, besides, 15 cases were both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. The accuracy for T3 staging was 89.8%(44/49) and 93.9%(46/49) respectively, the sensitivity was 86.4%(19/22) and 95.5%(21/22) respectively, and the specificity was both 92.6%(25/27). Radiologist A made correct diagnosis for 19 cases, understaged 2 cases and overstaged 1 case. Radiologist B made correct diagnosis for 21 cases and only overstaged 1 case. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T4a staging was 98.0%(48/49), 7/7 and 97.6%(41/42) respectively, besides, 7 cases were both diagnosed correctly. The overall accuracy of T staging was 85.7%(42/49) and 89.8%(44/49) by two radiologists respectively. The accuracy for differentiating T1/T2 from T3/T4 was 91.8%(45/49) and 95.9%(47/49) by two radiologists respectively. Radiologist A overstaged 2 cases and understaged 2 cases, and radiologist B overstaged 2 cases.CONCLUSION:High-resolution MRI can accurately evaluate preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and help select the high-risk rectal cancer patients with over T3 to receive neoadjuvant treatment.

Evaluation of the Central Lung Cancer with 3.0T MRI Comparing with Conventional CT

Application of 3.0T-MRI DWI in evaluating the efficacy of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer

Assessment of TSE-17-db-iPAT T_2WI sequence in the diagnosis of lung masses on 3.0T MR scanner

Value of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Quantitative Analysis in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

[Preoperative T Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of the Efficacy of 64-MDCT Versus 3.0T MR Imaging].

Clinical value of 3.0T MRI combined with computer aided diagnosis in breast tumors

Diagnostic Value of 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Benign and Malignant Lung Tumors

Application of 3.0T MRI in the preoperative assessment of rectal carcinoma

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiation diagnosis of centrallung cancer from postobstructive lobar collapse-preliminary study

A Primary Analysis on Measuring Repeatability of the Maximum Diameter Between CT and MR Imaging for Lung Cancers

Differentiation of Central Lung Cancer from Atelectasis: Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Mri with Pet/Ct

The Presurgical T Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy Comparison of 64-MDCT and 3.0 T MRI.

Value of 1.5T MRI and 3.0T MRI Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Image quality and detection efficacy of zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging on Lung-RADS 2 pulmonary ground-glass nodules in comparison to thin-slice fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging

The Capacity of Spiral CT and Post-Imaging Processing Techniques in Evaluation of the Tracheobronchial Tree Involvement from Central Lung Cancer

Comparative study of differential diagnosis value in preoperative T-staging of advanced gastric cancer between 3.0T MRI and 64-slice spiral CT

Diagnostic Value of 3.0-Tesla High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasion Depth of ;rectal Cancer

Evaluation of primary adnexal masses with 3.0T MRI:value of conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in categorization

A comparison between 3.0 T MRI and histopathology for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

The Capacity of Spiral CT Angiography in Evaluation of the Central Pulmonary Vascular Involvement from Central Lung Cancer

Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Tumor Region of Radiation Therapy Identification