Abstract:Our daily life sees the frequent infringement of citizen's fundamental rights among private individuals. With the absence of common laws and regulations, can the judge mete out judgment in accordance with Constitution in such cases? Hereby we have the issue of application of constitution in private law sphere. The traditional constitutional theory holds that the fundamental rights are the citizen's rights against government. And constitutional rights have no effect over the disputes among private citizens. However, with the changes in economic conditions and social structure, more and more cases have appeared in which the fundamental rights are subjecting to violations among private individuals. To deal with such situations, the German Federal Constitutional Court turns the fundamental rights into an abstract objective order of values, in that way the constitutional rights are given dual characteristics. An issue arising from such a practice is a controversy between ″direct effect theory″ and ″indirect effect theory″ regarding the way the judge makes application of the constitution. However, all countries have been extremely cautious and strict in application of constitution in private law sphere. Specifically speaking, in judicial process of protecting the fundamental rights, the judge must make a clear differentiation of the relations between constitutional rights and civil rights, which mainly present themselves in the following three areas: first, the difference in the legal relations to be adjusted; second, the difference in tendencies towards the key components of rights; and third, difference in targets of rights obligations and ways of their realization. In light of the current situation in China, however, studies are still needed of the rationality of direct application of constitution in private law. From the point of comparative law, the issue was not put forward in western countries until a fair maturity of constitutional practices and theories was achieved;next, the lawful order in the West depends on the formations and maturity of a civil society; furthermore, it is not conform to the intrinsic requirement of China's current political system. Finally, technical problems remain in the judge's direct application of constitution in private law area. Under such circumstances, it is advisable to render fundamental rights functional in private law relation by way of constitutional interpretation and realize indirect application through value infiltration. Meanwhile, the general clauses in private law can be seen as a cut-in point for fundamental rights. Judges are also required to give full display to judicial initiatives.

Demarcation Line Between Rights: A Perspective of the First Amendment to US Constitution

The Demarcation Line between Rights——Illustrated by Article V. of German Fundamental Law

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

The Conflict and Congruity between Freedom of Expression and Personal Right

A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China

On Concurrence of Basic Rights

Thinking Frame of Constitution of Fundamental Rights

The Function of Constitution in the Private Law Order

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

The Boundary Tablet Marking the Intellectual Province of Constitutional Law——A Dialogue about the Constituent Power between a Political Scientist and a Constitutional Legal Scholar

The Contact Point and Difference between the Principle of Prohibition of Excessively Abundant Restriction and the Principle of Prohibition of Excessively Deficient Protection as Constitutional Principles

On the Normative Intention of Defamation, the Right of Supervision and the 41st Clause of the Constitution

The Theory of the Interactive Relationship Between the Fundamental Constitutional Rights and Civil Rights:From the Perspective of the Right of Personality

Social Justice, Recognition Theory and the First Amendment: A New Approach to Hate Speech Restriction

The Constitutional Rights under the Special Power Nexus

Setting Boundaries Between Crime and Rights

The Logic of the Limitation of Public Interest on Basic Rights

A Confucian Theory of Rights

Governing in Accordance with Constitution:A Guiding Principle to Judge the Criticism and Supervision Rights of Netizens

The Normative Meaning of Human Dignity as a Fundamental Right

Limits of Justice: Between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint