Abstract:In our model a reform is a switch from one norm of behavior (equilibrium) to another and agents have to endure private costs of transition in case of a reform. A (local) authority, which coordinates the transition, can enforce transfers across the agents and is capable of imposing punishments upon them. A transfer/tax is limited, however, by an agent's equilibrium payoff ,a nd a punishment can not exceed an upper bound monitored by a "third party" (in- ternational community). Implementing a good (Pareto improving) reform can be hindered by asymmetric information about the costs of transition, which are privately known to the agents and can not be observed by the authority. In this case even a benevolent authority may need to credibly threaten agents with a punishment to induce both the desired behavior and the truthtelling about the costs, as otherwise some good reforms will not be implementable, even with Bayesian mechanisms. Allowing for harsher punishments in that framework reduces to 'softening' the individual rationality constraint, thus widening the range of implementable reforms. The flip-side of increasing the admissible pun- ishment is making 'bad' reforms feasible. With the international community setting a uniform standard of (negative) human rights (or maximal level of punishment) across countries, some will be unable to implement good reforms, while others will be prone to undesirable transitions. We, thus, formulate a trade-off between a successful implementation of good reforms from the utili- tarian perspective and well-being of selected individuals in the society.

Efficiency and Fairness under Non-Pareto Transition

EFFICIENCY OF COLLECTIVE ACTIONS UNDER THE VISION OF PUBLIC CHOICE AND ITS INSTITUTIONAL CONNOTATION

Rethinking Liberty:On Sen's impossibility of a Paretian libertarian theorem

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

Citizen Participation and the Efficiency of Public Investment——A Case Study on Zeguo Town Wenling County

The Reform of College Entrance Examination： Priority to Fairness or Efficiency

Coordination Between Efficiency and Fairness:from Ideas to Practice

Discussion of the Relationship between Fairness and Efficiency ——Based on Rawls' “A Theory of Justice”

Does it Take a Tyrant to Implement a Good Reform?

Promoting Social Progress with Distributive Justice

Between Commons and Anticommons: a Nested Common-Private Interface Framework

Reform Without Losers: an Interpretation of China'S Dual-Track Approach to Transition

On the Necessity and the Approach-Selectingof Pushing forward Social Fairness

Assessing Performance and Disparities in China’s Land Finance Transition: Insights from Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Marxism

Making a Competitive Selection or a Compromise?—An Explanatory Framework and a Consensus-centered Model in the Process of Policymaking in China's Economic Transition

Fairness Compatibility Constraints and Collective Actions

The Reform of the System of Income Allocation and Social Equity

Pareto Optimal Sharing Rules Belancing Budget

Some Different Points about the Essay "Thoughts of the Relations among Efficiency, Fairness and Justness"

Social Differences and Equal Rights in Chinese Mode

Provision of Public Good,Perception of Fairness and Income Distribution