The Influence of Narrow-Banding Imaging Cystoscopy in the Pathological Difference Between Biopsy and Operation

LI Wei,ZHANG Kai-yan,WU Zhun,LIU Rong-fu,CHEN Bin,CHEN Yue-dong,WANG Hui-qiang,XING Jin-chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1674-4624.2013.05.006
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the role of narrow-band imaging cystoscopy in the pathological difference between biopsy and operation. Methods 205 bladder cancer patients were divided into two groups:109 in white light cystoscopic biopsy group and 96 in narrow-band imaging cystoscopic biopsy group.The pathological difference before and after operation between two groups were compared. Results In white light cystoscopic biopsy group,23,60,22,4 cases before operation diagnosed with G0,G1,G2,G3 while 15,41,31,22 cases after operation diagnosed with G0,G1,G2,G3.There were 51 cases (46.8%) with underestimated histologic grade,7 cases (6.4%) overestimated and 51 cases (46.8%) matched.In narrow-band imaging cystoscopic biopsy group,15,45,30,6 cases diagnosed with G0,G1,G2,G3 before operation while 14,21,46,15 cases with G0,G1,G2,G3 after operation.There were 45 cases (46.9%) with underestimated histologic grade,14 cases (14.6%) overestimated and 37 cases (38.5%) matched.No difference could be found between these two groups.But when concerning G1 subgroup,28 cases (62.2%) were underestimated histologic grade in narrow-band imaging cystoscopic biopsy group comparing to 25 cases (41.7%) in white light biopsy group,χ2=7.067,P=0.029.After follow up for mean 15 months,white light cystoscopic biopsy group recurrent for 38 cases while narrow-band imaging group recurrent only 9 cases,χ2=5.25,P=0.02. Conclusions Though narrow-banding imaging cystoscopy could not decrease underestimated cases,but it could find more low grade lesions especially G1grade that would be confirmed having more malignancy after operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?