Abstract:This paper studies the exporting decision of Chinese manufacturing firms. The economic framework stresses the dynamic decision by both state controlled and private entities to export in a model with labor adjustment costs. In this complex environment, a simple decision rule whereby export status depends only on current productivity does not hold. Nor does this rule match data patterns. The estimated model is used to understand the factors that influence export status. The analysis highlights the economic significance of labor adjustment costs in shaping both employment and trade dynamics. 1 Motivation China is the largest exporting country in the world. In 2019, its exports of goods reached a record high of almost 2.5 trillion U.S. dollars, accounting for 13% of goods exports in the world and around 20% of China’s GDP.1 At the plant level, China’s exporters do not fit neatly into the standard patterns documented in the literature. First, although China’s exporters are on average relatively larger, they are typically not more productive. Second, ownership plays a prominent role in exporting. Privately controlled firms are more likely to export and those that do sell most of their output in the foreign market. In contrast, state controlled export less frequently and earn a smaller share abroad. This paper asks: what are the determinants of trade status? A simple and forceful answer is productivity: high productivity firms are exporters, others only sell domestically. But, at least for China, this simple prediction is inconsistent with the data. Figure 1 shows the distributions of the average (revenue) productivity of labor across manufacturing plants in China, by ownership.2 The left panel displays the distribution for exporters and non-exporters of state controlled enterprises, hereafter SCE, while the right focuses on privately controlled enterprises, hereafter PCE. ⇤Department of Economics, European University Institute; Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University; Research Associate, NBER, russellcoop@gmail.com †School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics ‡Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University §CCER, National School of Development, Peking University Data are from China trade statistics released by World Bank: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/CHN. Details of the data underlying this figure are provided in Section 2. 1

Entry Costs and the Productivity Puzzle of Chinese Exporters

The Productivity Puzzle of Chinese Exporters: Perspectives of Local Protection and Spillover Effects

Firm heterogeneity and exporting behavior: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms

Review of the Relationship between the Export Behavior and Productivity in Chinese Enterprises:2001—2007

Productivity and Firms’ Sales Destination: Chinese Characteristics

Do Domestic and Foreign Exporters Differ in Learning by Exporting? Evidence from China

Chinese Export Firms' 'productivity Paradox' and Its Explanations

Firms? Entry Choices Across Export Products and Markets, and the Consequences of Trade in an Open Economy: Evidence from China

The “productivity Paradox” of Chinese Export Firms: Review and Assessment

Selection , Survival and Sorting Across International Markets : Evidence from Chinese Exporters

Internet Penetration and Multi‐product Exporters: Firm‐level Evidence from China

The puzzle of quality upgrading of Chinese exports from the trade liberalization perspective

Agglomeration, Productivity, and FirmsÂ¡Â® Exports: Evidence from Chinese Firm-level Data

Trade Cost and Heterogeneity of Pure Exporters

A Research On Corporate Productivity And Exporting From The Perspective Of Self-Selection

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EXPORTING FROM CHINA: THE DETERMINANTS OF TRADE STATUS

Product Churning, Reallocation, and Chinese Export Growth

Exports’ Effects on Productivity from the View of Industry Heterogeneity

Do Export Demand Shocks Affect the Export Quality of Multi‐product Firms? Evidence from China

Exports, ownership and firm productivity: Evidence from China

Export, Productivity Pattern, and Firm Size Distribution