Abstract:Background and objective: Gentrification generally refers to changes in residents or operators in neighborhoods by investment in capital, a phenomenon in which wealthy or young professionals replace existing residents or operators in socioeconomic terms. Although conducted mainly in capitalist cities, some studies dealt with socialist systems or state-led gentrification. We intended to demonstrate the gentrification in North Korean by examining the cases of the socialist system and state-led gentrification and looking at urban development and urban space restructuring in Pyongyang Metropolitan Area in North Korea.Methods: To build up methodological framework of the study, we reviewed previous literature that deals with gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems, and state-led planning. About the gentrification phenomenon in North Korea, we examined secondary data of North Korea refugee interviews with North Korea government documents and research papers about Pyongyang's building and real estate development. Then, we compared gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist systems (or state-led planning), and North Korea.Results: Gentrification in capitalist cities, socialist system and North Korea differs in their enabling conditions, gentrifying agents, gentrifiers, and processes. National and local governments, usually with the North Korea communist party, play a leading role as gentrifying agents through their public policy. In the gentrification processes, there is an increasing gap between rich and poor and spatial separation between them, especially when displaced households being pushed out of town in North Korea.Conclusion: Urban development and apartment construction in Pyongyang shows the possibility of developing into existing gentrification, and if the private sector that leads gentrification occurs and at the same time, spatial replacement by privileged or upper classes appears, it will be clear that it is a kind of gentrification under the command economy.

The Nature and Direction of Economic Reform in North Korea

Market Socialism in North Korea: A Comparative Perspective

The Evolution of China Labor Market and Government Behavior

Why North Korea Could Not Implement the Chinese Style Reform and Opening? The Internal Contradiction Between Economic Reform and Political Stability

Introduction: China's Economic Reform in Comparative Perspective

Openness and Growth in North Korea: Evidence from Time-Series Data

Useless Men, Entrepreneurial Women, and North Korea's Post-Socialism: Transformation of Gender Roles Since the Early 1990s

On the Theoretical Source of the Reform of Socialist Open Economy with Chinese Characteristics

HOW TO REFORM A PLANNED ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM CHINA

Economic Reform and the Chinese Political Crisis of 1989

Autonomy and Incentives in Chinese State Enterprises

Transplantation and adaptation of the Soviet economic model in North Korea, 1945-1960

How Reform Worked in China

Gentrification in the Command Economy: A Story of Pyongyang Metropolitan Area in North Korea

ECONOMIC REFORMS AND SOCIALIST CITY STRUCTURE: A CASE STUDY OF GUANGZHOU, CHINA

South Korean Economy at the Crossroads: Structure Issues under External Pressure – An Essay from a Law and Development Perspective

Lenin’s NEP and Deng Xiaoping’s Economic Reform

Restructuring and Reform: China 2016

Economic Reform and Structural Change

Neo-liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: Social conditions and outcomes

China’s reform and opening process: a new model of political economy?