Abstract:This research intends to identify the influential factors in the 2007 National Pension System (NPS) reform in Korea (the Republic of Korea) which drove the NPS toward a structural transformation. This research also examines the applicability of the theory of Clemens and Cook (1999) to the Korean policy shift, who argue that the innate driving force of a policy, an internal contradiction, can be a critical source of structural policy change. A literature review based case study was carried out in this research. The findings are as follows. Firstly, rising fiscal conservatism was the main determinant of the 2007 NPS structural reform. The processes and conditions of the reform documented were: the fiscal conservatism embedded in NPS generated serious policy problems and led to an accumulation of the internal contradictions within NPS by raising the question on its fundamental policy goal. As time passed without any self-correction mechanism with respect to the problematic policy, the NPS lost credibility in the eyes of the public and also lost policy legitimacy. At the same time, there was a competing policy alternative to the NPS. This was the universalistic tax-based Basic Old-Age Pension System. This has been a challenge to NPSin that it had been designed based on the social insurance financing principle. The pre-conditions for the structural NPS reform were fully complete and they could be exploited by self-interested political parties in the following policy-making stages. Secondly, the theoretical assumption that the internal contradiction of a policy can be a decisive power for structural transformation, as suggested by Clemens and Cook (1999) among others, was proven to be theoretically and practically accurate in the Korean public pension reform case.

Neo-liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: Social conditions and outcomes

South Korean Economy at the Crossroads: Structure Issues under External Pressure – An Essay from a Law and Development Perspective

South Korea During the Park Chung Hee Era: Explaining Korea’s Developmental Decades

Globalisation and Institutional Change in the State-Led Model: The Case of Corporate Governance in South Korea

From the financial crisis to the next eleven: limits and contradictions in the Korean process of capital accumulation

Global Forces and Corporate Reforms in South Korea

The Neo-Confucian right and family politics in South Korea: The nuclear family as an ideological construct

The developmental welfare state in South Korea under globalization

Domestic Institutions, Liberalization Patterns, and Uneven Crises in Korea and Taiwan

Redesign or demise of old Developmental States? East Asia in the post-financial crisis of 2008

The neo-developmental cultural industries policy of Korea: rationales and implications of an eclectic policy

South Korea’s Transformation into an Imperialist Power

Insights From The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election: Polarisation, Fractured Politics, Inequality, And Constraints On Power

The Impact of Fiscal Conservatism ; A Case Study of the 2007 National Pension System Reform in Korea

The Politics of Technological Upgrading in South Korea: How Government and Business Challenged the Might of Qualcomm

Neoliberalism and the Decline of the Developmental State

The dual challenge of geopolitics/geoeconomics and South Korea’s economic security strategy: Continuity and Change

Transition to Sustainable Growth in South Korea: Investment and Trade under Uncertainty

Women's Labor Movement, State Suppression, and Democratization in South Korea

Subordinate financialization and financial subsumption in South Korea

South Korea’s lift-off to development: The role of Human Capital and Productivity in economic growth, 1960-1979