Abstract:Objective To evaluate the accuracy, of different threshold segmentation of 18FDG PET for target volume delineation of non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and the potential influence on radiotherapy treatment planning. Methods Eight NSCLC patients who had tumor with clear margin on CT scan and the amplitude of tumor movements not more than 5 mm were enrolled. PET scans were carried out at 1 h after intravenous injection of 18FDG with CT image for attenuation revisement. Gross target volume (GTV) delineated on CT image ( GTVCT ) was used as the standard. Then, GTVs were delineated on PET image with three different threshold segmentation of 42% Imax(total) (42% of maximum voxel intensity within the tumor) ,Iback + 20% Imax-back(max) (mean background intensity + 20% of normalized background-subtracted maximum voxel intensity within the tumor) and Iback -20% Imax-back(slice) (mean background intensity + 20% of normalized background-subtracted maximum voxel intensity of each slice within the tumor) ,the corresponding GTV was named as GTV42%, GTV20%max and GTV20%slice. Both the size of GTV42%, GTV20%max, GTV20%slice and GTVCT,and the coverage over GTVCT for each GTV were compared. A three dimensional margin of 1 cm were added to GTVCT, GTV42%, GTV20%max and GTV20%slice to form corresponding PTVCT, PTV42%, PTV20%max and PTV20%slic e. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment plans were designed based on PTVCT,PTV42% , PTV20%max and PTV20%slice respectively for each patient. The prescription dose of all PTVs was 66 Gy in 33 fractions in 6.6 weeks. Both the volume accepting dose less than 95% of prescription dose within PTVCT ( VPTV ) and the lung V20 were compared among the four plans based on different PTVs. Tumor control probability(TCP) as well as lung normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were also compared. Resuits Eight patients were enrolled in this study. Median deviation of volume between GTVPET and GTVCT were -54.1% , -21.5 % and 5.3 % for GTV42% , GTV20%max and GTV20%slice, respectively. Median coverage over GTVCT of GTV42% , GTV20%max and GTV20%slice was 45.9% ,78.0% and 95.3% respectively( F = 57.50,P＜0.01). Median 7.5% of VPTV was observed for radiotherapy treatment plan based on PTV42% ,which meant that it might induce median 1% decrease of TCP comparing with that of radiotherapy treatment plan based on PTVCT. Whereas,there were only 1.3% and 0.0% of VPTV for treatment plans based on PTV20%max and PTV20%slice respectively. As far as TCP was concemed, both PTV20%max group and PTV20%slice group were superior to PTV42% group,there was no significant difference among PTV20%max group, PTV20%slice group and PTVCT group. Lung V20 and lung NTCP showed no significant difference among all groups. Conclusions The threshold segmentation of Iback + 20% Imax-back(slice) , being slice specialized, might be an optimal threshold segmentation for target volume delineation of lung caner. Independent of information of target volume provided by CT scan in advance,it is recommended to use for the target volume delineation of NSCLC with atelectasis.

Evaluation of Gross Tumor Size Using CT, 18F-FDG PET, Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT and Pathological Analysis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical Significance of FDG Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography: Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancers and Study of Its Mechanism.

Evaluation of lung lesions using FDG γ-camera PET equipped with a one-inch crystal

GTV Spatial Conformity Between Different Delineation Methods by 18FDG PET/CT and Pathology in Esophageal Cancer

Variation in Background Intensity Affects PET-based Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: the Need for Individualized Information

Gross Tumor Volume Definition and Comparative Assessment for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma From 3D <SUP>18</SUP>F-FDG PET/CT by Deep Learning-Based Method

Improvement of Delineating Target in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with 18F-FDG Hpet/ct Imaging

The role of 18 F-FDG PET in minimizing variability in gross tumor volume delineation of soft tissue sarcomas

PET CT Thresholds for Radiotherapy Target Definition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: How Close Are We to the Pathologic Findings?

The Advantage of PET and CT Integration in Examination of Lung Tumors

P29.05 Gross Tumor Volume Contouring Variations in Radiation Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

FDG PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer: relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and extensional or metastatic potential.

Gross Tumor Volume Definition and Comparative Assessment for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma From 3D 18F-FDG PET/CT by Deep Learning-Based Method

The Impact of Diffusion-Weighted MRI on the Definition of Gross Tumor Volume in Radiotherapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Impact of three threshold segmentation of 18FDG PET image on target volume delineation and radiotherapy treatment planning of non-small cell lung cancer

The Potential of Basal F-18-FDG PET/CT in Evaluating Prognosis and Benefit from Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Tumor Resection of Stage IB(T2, ≤3cm with VPI, N0, M0)NSCLC

Autocontouring and Manual Contouring: Which is the Better Method for Target Delineation Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Local imaging to interpret tumor size in F18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT in lung cancers

Comparison of 18F-Fluoroerythronitroimidazole and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and prognostic value in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Is It Possible to Establish a Reliable Correlation between Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of 18-Fluorine Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Histological Types of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? Analysis of the Italian VATS Group Database

Consequences of additional use of contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT in target volume delineation and dose distribution for pancreatic cancer