Abstract:Compared with financial information, whether corporate social responsibility disclosure has impacts on debt financing cost has obviously become a heated topic in the academic. This paper selects A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets of China from 2013 to 2017 as sample to study the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost, including bond financing cost and bank loan cost. In addition, this paper divides the sample into voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure group and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure group and studies whether the effects of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure and mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost and bank loan cost are different. The empirical results are presented as follows: Firstly, enterprise disclosing high-quality corporate social responsibility report is more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost. Specifically, corporate social responsibility disclosure significantly lowers both the bond financing cost and bank loan cost. Moreover, the reduction impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on bond financing cost is greater than that of bank loan cost. Secondly, enterprises voluntarily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than that of enterprises mandatorily disclosing corporate social responsibility reports. Thirdly, non-state-owned enterprises are more conducive to reducing debt financing cost than that of state-owned enterprise. The enterprises with more market competition are more conducive to reducing the debt financing cost than the oligopolistic enterprises. Finally, this paper concludes and gives policy implications. This paper amplifies the literature regarding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure and improves the understanding of the impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on debt financing cost.

Debt Financing Cost and Credit Discrimination on Private Listed Firms

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

An Empirical Study on Financing Cost for Equity Financing Vs. Debt Financing of China's Listed Companies

Can't Debt Come into Play Governance Effect Really?The New Evidence Based on the Listed Real Estate Companies in China

Ownership and Financing Discrimination: Evidence from Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity of Chinese Listed Firms

Maturity Mismatches of Chinese Listed Firms

Study on Debt Heterogeneity and Debt Financing Cost from the Perspective of Social Capital

Debt Financing Research of Companies Prior to Being Listed in ChiNext

Bank Supervision and Agency Costs of China's Public Listed Firms

Separation of Ownership and Control for Chinese Listed Firms: Effect on the Cost of Debt and the Moderating Role of Bank Competition

Does Penalty Decision Affect Firms'Bank Loans --Empirical Evidence from China Listed Companies

Corporate social responsibility and debt financing cost: evidence from China

Industrial policy, corporate strategic differences, and debt financing cost

The effect of corporate governance on debt financing cost of listed companies

Monetary Contractions,Bank Discrimination and the Wealth Loss of Non-state Listed Firms' Investors

The Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Firm Ownership,Corporate Financing,and Trade Credit in China

Private placements of equity and accessibility of bank loans

On Chinese Listed Companies' Financing Pecking Order Based on Information Asymmetry

Private Firms' Political Connection,Profitability Information and Long-term Debt Contract

Reputation,Institutional Environment and Debt Financing:Evidence from Private-owned Listed Firms in China