Abstract:Objective To detect adverse drug reaction(ADR)signals using data mining algorithm and exPlore its aPPlication value. Methods RePorts on adverse reactions induced by anti-infective drugs in National centor for ADR monitoring from January 2009 to December 2013 were collected and Potential ADR risk signals were detected using ProPortional rePorting ratio method( PRR),rePorting odds ratio method( ROR),Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency method( MHRA),Bayesian confidence ProPagation neural network method(BCPNN),and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker method (MGPS). The results of detection using the above-mentioned 5 signal detection methods were comPared. Results A total of 35 807 ADR rePorts induced by anti-infective drugs were collected,35 759 effective rePorts were entered,and 834 susPected drugs were involved. In the 35 759 rePorts,464 kinds of ADR were defined according to lowest level term and 21 kinds of ADR were defined according to system∕ organ classification. After the data cleaning,sPlitting,and encoding Process,6 620 rePorts containing susPected drug-adverse reaction combination were acquired. There were 3 966 rePorts(59. 91% )in which susPected drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared once,937 rePorts(14. 15% )in which susPected drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared twice,and 1 717 rePorts(25. 94% ) in which susPicious drug-adverse reaction combination aPPeared more than thrice. The number of ADR signals detected using PRR,ROR, MGPS,BCPNN,and MHRA was 651,614,306,75,and 57,resPectively;the categories of drugs were194,168,124,34 and 40,resPectively;ADR tyPes were 139,139,121,35,and 40,resPectively. In the toP ten risk signals,azithromycin-nausea were detected by the 5 signal detection methods,levofloxacin-Pruritus were detected by PRR,ROR,MHRA,and BCPNN. The toP ten signals detected by PRR were totally same as those by ROR and signals detected by other methods were various. Conclusions Potential risk signals in ADR rePorts could be detected systematically and automatically using PRR,ROR,MGPS, BCPNN,and MHRA. However,each method has its own advantage and disadvantage and should be aPPlied according to the actual situation and demand.

Methods of Controlling Confounding Factors in Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Detection

Application of Stratification Analysis in Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Detection

Signal Detection Methods Based on False Discovery Rate of Adverse Drug Reaction

Present Status and Future Prospect of Signal Detection Methods for Adverse Drug Reaction

Common Signal Detection Methods of Adverse Drug Reaction

Masking Effect in the Process of Signal Detection of Adverse Drug Reaction

Research progress in adverse drug reaction signal detection methods based on spontaneous reporting system

[Active Surveillance of Adverse Drug Reaction in the Era of Big Data: Challenge and Opportunity for Control Selection].

A method for signal detection of adverse drug reactions based on mutual information

Application of Data Mining Algorithm to Detect Adverse Drug Reaction Signal

Application of Meta-analysis in the Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Detection

Analysis of Application of Disproportional Measures in Pharmacovigilance

Application of Association Rules Analysis in Mining Adverse Drug Reaction Signals

Association Rules in the Surveillance of Adverse Drug Reaction Signals Detection

Detecting high-quality signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from spontaneous reporting data

An Improved Algorithm for ADR Signal Detection and Its Application to Shanghai Spontaneous ADR Reporting System

A simulation-based comparison of drug-drug interaction signal detection methods

A novel method for signal detection of adverse drug reactions based on proportional reporting ratios

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Signal Detection and Ascertaining Precision of Adverse Event Rates in Clinical Trials

Establishment of a Rapid Identification of Adverse Drug Reaction Program in R Language Implementation Based on Monitoring Data

Application of Data Mining Algorithms in Pharmacovigilance