Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study the correlation, consistency, and variations between two assays of DNA fragmentation index based on acridine orange (AO) staining via AI-based fluorescence microscopy(AI-DFI), and flow cytometry (FCM-DFI) across multiple centers. METHODS:We selected 421 male patients from Nanjing Drum Tower hospital ( Hospital G) (226 cases), Eastern Theatre General Hospital (Hospital J) (89 cases) and Jiangsu Province Hospital (Hospital S) (106 cases) . Semen samples from each patient were analyzed for routine semen parameters and for DFI using both AI fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. We studied the two methods' stability as well as the correlation, consistency, and variation between the two methods' results in various centers. RESULTS:The two replicate studies' results of AI-DFI and the three centers' FCM-DFI for linear regression analysis indicated strong stability (R2>0.9).Overall(Group A), the AI-DFI results demonstrated good correlation and consistency with the FCM-DFI results of three centers (r>0.85；ICC>0.9).The semen specimens were categorized into two groups: normal specimen group (group B) and abnormal specimen group (group C) (including asthenozoospermia, oligospermia, and semen samples with high impurities).Group C's results showed a decline in correlation and consistency when compared to group A and group B, whereas group B's results showed a little rise in correlation and consistency when compared to group A. Although the consistency and correlation between the results of the two DFI testing methods in the three centers were good, there was still a significant difference between Groups A and C (P<0.05), and in Group B there was a significant difference between the two DFI testing methods only in Hospital G (p＝0.02), with no significant difference in Hospitals J and S (P> 0.05). CONCLUSION:The two detection methods exhibit good stability and correlation. However, significant differences are observed in the DFI detection methods in samples with abnormal semen parameters and high complexity. The main reason for these significant differences may lie in the variations in detection principles. Each detection method has its own advantages, allowing clinical or research settings to choose between them based on laboratory conditions or specific requirements.

Comparision Between two Methods for Measuring Survival rate of stem cell

Morphological observation and analysis using automated image cytometry for the comparison of trypan blue and fluorescence-based viability detection method

A Study on Real Time Estimation Viability of Cells Based on Dic

Development of an assay for the detection of the survival rates of cells by flow cytometry

Comparing automated cell imaging with conventional methods of measuring cell proliferation and viability

Comparison of Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Anticancer Drugs between Real-Time Cell Analysis and CCK-8 Method

Comparison of Methods for Measuring Viable E. Coli Cells During Cultivation: Great Differences in the Early and Late Exponential Growth Phases.

Comparison of two blood cell separators in collection of peripheral blood stem cell/progenitor cells and effectiveness of transplantation

Study on Comparison of Two in Vitro Cytotoxicity Tests

[A Methodology Study on Flow Cytometric Analysis of Cell DNA Stained with DAPI and Hoechst33342].

Quantitative, traceable determination of cell viability using absorbance microscopy

Viability assessment of human sperm using Transgreen and propidium iodide

Functional comparison of PBMCs isolated by Cell Preparation Tubes (CPT) vs. Lymphoprep Tubes

New Method For Studying The Relationship Between Morphological Parameters And Cell Viability

Comparison of peripheral blood automated hematopoietic progenitor cell count and flow cytometric CD34+ cell count

Evaluation of a continuous quantification method of apoptosis and necrosis in tissue cultures

Cell Harvesting Methods Affect Cellular Integrity of Adherent Cells During Apoptosis Detection

Detection on survival rate of different cell subpopulations in mixed cell population by flow cytometry

Evaluating the Feasibility of Nucleated Cells Isolated by Lysis Method for Real-time Quantitative RT-PCR

[Comparative analysis of two assaysin detection of sperm DNA fragmentation index, flow cytometry and AI-based fluorescence microscopy, based on AO staining: A multicentre study].

Quantifying Cell Viability Through Organelle Ratiometric Probing.