Abstract:Abstract Frameworks that seek to understand how knowledge restructuring occurs and how to build a learning environment that facilitates this restructuring raise important philosophical, psychological and pedagogical questions and issues about how conceptual change occurs and what characteristics of knowledge growth ought to be a part of curricula and learning environments. Implicit in emphasizing the how is a shift in science educations' perspective from one that embraces “scientists' ways of knowing” as the dominant objective towards one that favors “positioning the learner for the next step.” This change in perspective and approach represents a radical and complex departure from common practice. This article advances a piecemeal model of the character and mechanism of restructuring and then describes a model of educational practice designed to facilitate this form of restructuring. We argue that a piecemeal developmental perspective of conceptual change would offer quite different criteria for deciding what to teach and how to teach. The adoption of conceptual change teaching models implies teacher empowerment of a kind we have yet to fully understand. Empowering teachers with appropriate philosophical and psychological models for the selection and the sequencing of instructional tasks would aid in their describing and prescribing effective or meaningful learning strategies. Central to this educational model is a broadened and integrated view of assessment and instruction that we are calling a portfolio culture. The essential characteristic of this culture is that it creates opportunities for teachers and students to confront and develop their scientific understanding and to equip students with the tools necessary to take increased responsibility for their own restructuring, to assess for themselves what might be the next steps.

Theory,Data,and Instruments: On Ackermann's three-dimensional Dialectical Model of Knowledge Growth

The Dialectic Nature of the Activities in Science and Technology:the Unity of Reason and Unreason

On the Development of Scientific Theory

The Criticizing about Thesis "theory Ladenness of Observation/Experiment"

Is There Another Kind of Scientific Revolution?——On Peter Galison and His Trading Zone Theory

Reflections on Econometric Modeling Methodology

Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress

[The diversity of science in Carnap's, Lewin's and Fleck's philosophy. The development of a pluralistic scientific concept]

Scientific Theory of Knowledge Organization

The Scientific Epistemology of Althusser:From “duration” to “Rupture”

Albert Einstein’s “Physics and Reality” and “The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”

On Theoretical Logic of Evolution of Frankfurt School's Ethical Thoughts of Science

Reconsideration on Engels's Theory of"Resultant Forces"

From Constructivism to Generativism:The Historical Transition of Systematic Thought

Ernest Nagel's Model of Reduction and Theory Change

On Teachers' Practical Knowledge:From Dewey's Pragmatist View of Theories of Knowledge

Renzhi yu pingjia: Kexue lilun yu shiyan de donglixue (shang xia ce) 認知與評價:科學理論與實驗的動力學 (上、下冊) [Cognition and Evaluation: A Dynamics of Scientific Theories and Experiments, vols. 1 and 2]

An Attempt of Scientific Knowledge Explored in Traditional Chinese Philosophy:Taken Mr.He Lin’s Reason Concept of Time and Space as a Case

The 3-Dimension Construction of Classroom Assessment Knowledge and Its Implications in the Transformation of Knowledge Theory

Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for educational practice

Kuhn Revisited