Abstract:Abstract In precision machining of cylindrical parts, the measurement and evaluation of circularity is an indispensable component to quantify form tolerance. Of all the methods of measuring these form errors, the most precise is the one with accurate spindle/turntable type measuring instrument. On the instrument, the component is rotated on a highly accurate spindle which provides an imaginary circular datum. The workpiece axis is aligned with the axis of the spindle by means of a centering and tilt adjustment leveling table. Based on reference circles, this paper focuses on the four modeling methods of roundness, namely, (1) Least Squares Circle (LSC), (2) Maximum Inscribed Circle (MIC), (3) Minimum Circumscribed Circle (MCC) and (4) Minimum Zone or Minimum Radial Separation (MRS) Circles. These methods have been explained in author’s previous article in the context of their implications on design applications, advantages and disadvantages. In this article, the authors have investigated the dependence of these mathematical methods based circularity form error on instrument’s centering error (also known as eccentricity) and tilt error. Some intriguing results were observed for the highly nonlinear relationship of machine’s centering/tilt error with circularity results outside its useful linear region (50–600 μin for this specific machine used in this investigation). Further, the linear and nonlinear relationship was mapped within the effective boundaries of eccentricity settings to investigate the best and worst methods of circularity measurements that are susceptible to instrument errors. Very high and low machine eccentricity settings in its nonlinear regions were not accurately compensated by the machine in circularity results processing. In this study, a master part with different circular and cylindrical features was studied with varying levels of preset instrument eccentricity and tilt errors. Off the four methods, MRS reported the least circularity results. The other three methods didn’t provide any predictable trend. Circularity results were observed to differ up to 35% within these four methods. However, in this preliminary investigation, this maximum difference doesn’t appear to follow any predictable trend with varying machine eccentricities. This article also reinforces the significance of these parameters, and the way they should be understood and be incorporated into undergraduate and graduate engineering curriculum, and be taught as an improved toolkit to the aspiring engineers.

Study of Roundness Error Separation Based on Dynamic Measuring Model

Volumetric Error Modeling And Analysis For Cnc Machine Tool Based On Multi-Body System

Milling Error Prediction of Thin-Walled Parts During High-Speed Machining

Sest: A New Error Separation Technique for Ultra-High Precision Roundness Measurement

The Study on Rapid Identification of the Key Error Sources of Multi Axis Motion System Based on Quasi-Rigid Body Error Model

Design of Roundness Measurement Model with Multi-Systematic Error for Cylindrical Components with Large Radius.

Study on the Influence Rules of Static Mechanical Errors in Four-Linkage Precision Measuring Instrument and the Realization of Real-Time Error Correction with Computer-Aided Modeling Method

Three-Probe Error Separation with Chromatic Confocal Sensors for Roundness Measurement

A systematic error modeling and separation method for the special cylindrical profile measurement based on 2-dimension laser displacement sensor

A High-Precision Roundness Error Separation Method Based on Time–Frequency-Domain Transformation for Parameter Optimization

A systemic approach to identify the volumetric and dynamic errors for five-axis machine tools with double ball-bar test

Comparison of Error Separation Methods for Roundness and Straightness Measurement

Dynamic and Static Error Identification and Separation Method for Three-Axis CNC Machine Tools Based on Feature Workpiece Cutting

Study on Precision Modeling and Prediction of Five-axis NC Machine Tool

A Multi-error Measurement Method for Workpiece of Vertical Machine Tool

Study on Geometric Error Model of CNC Machine Tools under Actual Working Condition

Dependence of Measuring Instrument Eccentricity and Tilt Error on the Four Mathematical Methods of Circularity Form Errors

Investigation of Error Separation for Three Dimensional Profile Rotary Measuring System

High precision roundness measurement with two chromatic confocal sensors

Modeling, identification, and measurement of geometric errors for a rotary axis of a machine tool using a new R-test

Geometric Error Modeling and Decoupling Identification of Rotary Axis of Five-Axis Machine Tool Based on Spatial Trajectory Planning