Jan-Lukas Tirpitz,Udo Frieß,François Hendrick,Carlos Alberti,Marc Allaart,Arnoud Apituley,Alkis Bais,Steffen Beirle,Stijn Berkhout,Kristof Bognar,Tim Bösch,Ilya Bruchkouski,Alexander Cede,Ka Lok Chan,Mirjam den Hoed,Sebastian Donner,Theano Drosoglou,Caroline Fayt,Martina M. Friedrich,Arnoud Frumau,Lou Gast,Clio Gielen,Laura Gomez-Martín,Nan Hao,Arjan Hensen,Bas Henzing,Christian Hermans,Junli Jin,Karin Kreher,Jonas Kuhn,Johannes Lampel,Ang Li,Cheng Liu,Haoran Liu,Jianzhong Ma,Alexis Merlaud,Enno Peters,Gaia Pinardi,Ankie Piters,Ulrich Platt,Olga Puentedura,Andreas Richter,Stefan Schmitt,Elena Spinei,Deborah Stein Zweers,Kimberly Strong,Daan Swart,Frederik Tack,Martin Tiefengraber,René van der Hoff,Michel van Roozendael,Tim Vlemmix,Jan Vonk,Thomas Wagner,Yang Wang,Zhuoru Wang,Mark Wenig,Matthias Wiegner,Folkard Wittrock,Pinhua Xie,Chengzhi Xing,Jin Xu,Margarita Yela,Chengxin Zhang,Xiaoyi Zhao

Abstract:Abstract. The second Cabauw Intercomparison of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI-2) took place in Cabauw (the Netherlands) in September 2016 with the aim of assessing the consistency of multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) measurements of tropospheric species (NO2, HCHO, O3, HONO, CHOCHO and O4). This was achieved through the coordinated operation of 36 spectrometers operated by 24 groups from all over the world, together with a wide range of supporting reference observations (in situ analysers, balloon sondes, lidars, long-path DOAS, direct-sun DOAS, Sun photometer and meteorological instruments). In the presented study, the retrieved CINDI-2 MAX-DOAS trace gas (NO2, HCHO) and aerosol vertical profiles of 15 participating groups using different inversion algorithms are compared and validated against the colocated supporting observations, with the focus on aerosol optical thicknesses (AOTs), trace gas vertical column densities (VCDs) and trace gas surface concentrations. The algorithms are based on three different techniques: six use the optimal estimation method, two use a parameterized approach and one algorithm relies on simplified radiative transport assumptions and analytical calculations. To assess the agreement among the inversion algorithms independent of inconsistencies in the trace gas slant column density acquisition, participants applied their inversion to a common set of slant columns. Further, important settings like the retrieval grid, profiles of O3, temperature and pressure as well as aerosol optical properties and a priori assumptions (for optimal estimation algorithms) have been prescribed to reduce possible sources of discrepancies. The profiling results were found to be in good qualitative agreement: most participants obtained the same features in the retrieved vertical trace gas and aerosol distributions; however, these are sometimes at different altitudes and of different magnitudes. Under clear-sky conditions, the root-mean-square differences (RMSDs) among the results of individual participants are in the range of 0.01–0.1 for AOTs, (1.5–15) ×1014molec.cm-2 for trace gas (NO2, HCHO) VCDs and (0.3–8)×1010molec.cm-3 for trace gas surface concentrations. These values compare to approximate average optical thicknesses of 0.3, trace gas vertical columns of 90×1014molec.cm-2 and trace gas surface concentrations of 11×1010molec.cm-3 observed over the campaign period. The discrepancies originate from differences in the applied techniques, the exact implementation of the algorithms and the user-defined settings that were not prescribed. For the comparison against supporting observations, the RMSDs increase to a range of 0.02–0.2 against AOTs from the Sun photometer, (11–55)×1014molec.cm-2 against trace gas VCDs from direct-sun DOAS observations and (0.8–9)×1010molec.cm-3 against surface concentrations from the long-path DOAS instrument. This increase in RMSDs is most likely caused by uncertainties in the supporting data, spatiotemporal mismatch among the observations and simplified assumptions particularly on aerosol optical properties made for the MAX-DOAS retrieval. As a side investigation, the comparison was repeated with the participants retrieving profiles from their own differential slant column densities (dSCDs) acquired during the campaign. In this case, the consistency among the participants degrades by about 30 % for AOTs, by 180 % (40 %) for HCHO (NO2) VCDs and by 90 % (20 %) for HCHO (NO2) surface concentrations. In former publications and also during this comparison study, it was found that MAX-DOAS vertically integrated aerosol extinction coefficient profiles systematically underestimate the AOT observed by the Sun photometer. For the first time, it is quantitatively shown that for optimal estimation algorithms this can be largely explained and compensated by considering biases arising from the reduced sensitivity of MAX-DOAS observations to higher altitudes and associated a priori assumptions.

Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 by ground-based MAX-DOAS

Comparison of No2 Slant Columns Between Two Ground-Based Max-Doas

Inter-comparison of MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric HONO slant column densities and vertical profiles during the CINDI-2 campaign

MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT campaign: inter-comparison, sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings, and error budget

MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT Campaign: inter-comparison and sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings

Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign

Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO Slant Column Measurements by MAX-DOAS and Zenith-Sky UV–visible Spectrometers During CINDI-2

[MAX-DOAS measurements of NO2 column densities and vertical distribution at Ny-Alesund, Arctic during summer]

Investigating differences in DOAS retrieval codes using MAD-CAT campaign data

Supplementary Material to &quot;intercomparison of NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, O&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and HCHO Slant Column Measurements by MAX-DOAS and Zenith-Sky UV-Visible Spectrometers During the CINDI-2 Campaign&quot;

Retrieval of Tropospheric Ozone Profiles Using Ground-Based MAX-DOAS.

Validation of OMI, GOME-2A and GOME-2B tropospheric NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;, SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and HCHO products using MAX-DOAS observations from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China

MAX-DOAS NO2 Observations over Guangzhou, China; Ground-Based and Satellite Comparisons

Dectection and Distribution of Tropospheric NO2 Vertical Column Density Based on Mobile Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy

Long-term MAX-DOAS Network Observations of NO2 in Russia and Asia (MADRAS) During the Period 2007–2012: Instrumentation, Elucidation of Climatology, and Comparisons with OMI Satellite Observations and Global Model Simulations

Observations of tropospheric aerosols and NO2 in Hong Kong over 5years using ground based MAX-DOAS

MAX-DOAS and OMI Measurements of Tropospheric NO2 and HCHO over Eastern China

Tropospheric NO2 vertical column densities retrieved from ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements at Shangdianzi regional atmospheric background station in China

A Scanning Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy System for Measurement of Tropospheric No2 in Beijing

Retrieval of NO2 Total Vertical Columns by Direct-Sun Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy

Validation of Omi, Gome-2a and Gome-2b Tropospheric No2, So2 and Hcho Products Using Max-Doas Observations from 2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China: Investigation of the Effects of Priori Profiles and Aerosols on the Satellite Products