Clinical Analysis of Inserting Abel Central Venous Catheter into Pleural Cavity and Interrupted Pleural Cavity Puncture to Draw Pleural Effusion in the Treatment of Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion

Lin Hai,Chen Xianjing,Zhao Renguo,Zhang Minghua,Lin Sen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2013.04.052
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effects and safety of Abel central venous catheter with interrupted pleural cavity puncture in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion.Methods Totally 104 patients with malignant pleural effusions were randomly divided into experimental group(n=52)and control group(n=52) by envelope in our hospital from March 2009 to June 2012.Patients in the two groups were treated with inserting Abel central venous catheter and interrupted pleural cavity puncture to draw pleural effusion respectively.The effectiveness,complication and hospital stay in two groups were compared.Results After treatment,14(27%)cases in experimental group gained complete remission vs 0(0%)cases in control group,21(40%)cases gained partial remission vs 6(12%)cases,10(19%) cases gained minor response vs 20(38%)cases,7(13%)cases with no change vs 26(50%)cases.The total effective rate of the experimental group was obviously higher than that of the control group.The chest pain incidence in experimental group and control group were 40%and 15%,respectively;the dyspnea after operation were 15%and 35%,respectively;the pneumothorax incidence were 4%and 15%,respectively;the average time of hospital stay in experimental group and control group were 10.0±3.3 days and 17.5±3.6 days,respectively.All indexes showed significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion The method by inserting Abel central venous catheter to treat malignant pleural effusion has the advantages of reliable curative effects and little complication and it can shorten hospital stay.It is worthwhile to popularize and apply this treatment method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?