Mechanical, Team-Focused, Video-Reviewed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Emergency Department Implementation.
Daniel M. Rolston,Timmy Li,Casey Owens,Ghania Haddad,Timothy J. Palmieri,Veronika Blinder,Jennifer L. Wolff,Michael Cassara,Qiuping Zhou,Lance B. Becker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014420
IF: 6.106
2020-03-12
Journal of the American Heart Association
Abstract:Background Outcomes in cardiac arrest remain suboptimal. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has not demonstrated clear clinical benefit; however, video review provides the capability to monitor CPR quality and provide constructive feedback to individuals and teams to improve their performance. The aim of our study was to evaluate cardiac arrest outcomes before and after initiation of a mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed CPR intervention. Methods and Results In 2018, our emergency department began using mechanical CPR; a new team‐focused strategy with nurse‐led Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support; and biweekly, multidisciplinary video review of cardiac arrests. A revised approach to resuscitation was generated from a performance improvement session, and in situ simulation was used to disseminate our approach. The primary outcome of this study was the return of spontaneous circulation rate before and after our mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed CPR intervention. Secondary outcomes included survival to admission and discharge. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used. The pre‐ and postintervention groups were similar at baseline. A total of 248 patients were included in our study (97 before and 151 after mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed CPR). Return of spontaneous circulation was higher in the intervention group (41% versus 26%; P =0.014). There were nonsignificant increases in survival to admission (26% versus 20%; P =0.257) and survival to discharge (7% versus 3%; P =0.163). After controlling for covariates, the odds of return of spontaneous circulation remained higher after the intervention (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.14–3.89). Conclusions Implementation of our mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed CPR intervention for cardiac arrest patients in our emergency department improved return of spontaneous circulation rates. Survival to hospital admission and discharge did not improve. Clinical Perspective What Is New? In a large, tertiary care emergency department, a three‐component intervention to improve quality of cardiac arrest resuscitation including mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, team‐focused training, and video review feedback improved return of spontaneous circulation. This study was unique in its use of video review to monitor the quality of cardiac arrest resuscitation, to provide feedback to improve mechanical chest compression device placement, to modify the roles of cardiac arrest team members with specific defined tasks, and to identify recurrent opportunities for improvement in the care of patients with cardiac arrest. What Are the Clinical Implications? Emergency departments interested in improving cardiac arrest resuscitation should consider implementation of a mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed cardiopulmonary resuscitation program. This study, demonstrating an improvement in a resuscitation outcome with the use of video review, may make it easier for hospitals to obtain approval for video review quality improvement programs in the future. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms MTV‐CPR mechanical, team‐focused, video‐reviewed cardiopulmonary resuscitation MCCD mechanical chest compression device OHCA out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest IHCA In‐hospital cardiac arrest ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation E‐CPR extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation LUCAS Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System EMS emergency medical services BVM bag‐valve‐mask ETCO2 end‐tidal carbon dioxide CVC central venous catheter Survival from cardiac arrest remains suboptimal, despite recent improvements in public health measures, resuscitation science research, and technological advances. In 2016, out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival remained low at 12%. 1 A 2018 scientific statement by the American Heart Association suggests that enhanced resuscitation education has the potential to improve patient outcomes as much as any new scientific breakthroughs in the field. 2 Additionally, several studies have demonstrated that monitoring the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with improved cardiac arrest outcomes. 3 , -Abstract Truncated-
cardiac & cardiovascular systems