Abstract:Among the organizational change literature,adaptation view and ecological view were two dominant perspectives.Adaptation view suggests that the purpose of organizational change is to adapt and achieve strategic fit with their environment.Yet researchers embracing ecological view have argued for an environmental selection process which determined the outcome of organization's behavior.This study recommends a brand new research paradigm,named the entrepreneurial view after a brief review of the two former perspectives.We developed a multi-level analytic framework to examine the effects of organization's proactive activities on its competitive advantage.It has long been noted that in a complex and intense competitive situation,the performance of an organization was dependent on its actions and rivals' reactions,so we were also concerned about how the organization's activities might affect the market process.The results indicated that proactive top managers of the firm would set expectations and search to identify the opportunities resulted from knowledge problem existing in the market.Those actions could establish a firm's competitive advantage to the extent that they exploit competitive ambiguity.Entrepreneurial alertness,professional knowledge,and creativity were three most important predictors of opportunity identification.Top managers adopted a bisociation process linking previously related or unrelated matrices of thought to seize the opportunities through entrepreneurial actions.Schumpeter and Kirzner had respectively defined entrepreneurial actions in two distinctive ways which we proposed as equilibrating and disequilibrating actions.Both actions were the consequence of bisociation process.Entrepreneurial actions carried out by the firm would eventually update the belief systems of all the market participants,yet leading to different market conditions according to the actions' appropriateness.It's in this way the firm had the capability to push the market process.Further in this study we used competitive dynamics theory to discuss how the firms evolved with their environment and to explore how two characteristics of the top management team might influence firm's competitive success.A series of interrelated and logically consistent propositions were presented to elaborate our analytic framework.Implications for the entrepreneurial view were discussed.

The Trajectory of Organizational Flexible Forms and Its Theoretical Explanation

Formation of Network Organization and Its Routines--Based on the Views of the Evolutionary Theory

An Experimental Study on Firm Organizational Change,HR Strategy and Change Coping Behaviour: an Organizational Learning Perspective

The Dissipative Structure of Corporate Governant

Organizational Change and Market Process:An Entrepreneurial Perspective

Research On Enterprise Habitual Domains Evolving Theory And Its Application

The Exploration on the Entrepreneurship Performance Structure and the Explanation Based on Contract

Coordinating Changes in M-form and U-form Organizations

Strategic Flexibility’s Dominant Logic Evolution, Measurement and Antecedents：New Perspectives and Trends Analysis

The Paradox of Efficiency of Organizational Structure Evolution and Adaptation

Analysis of Evolvement and Influence of Relationship Structure in the Enterprises

Organization Structural Inertia: Concept, Dimensions and Principle of Formation

The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context

A Flexible Representation Of Product Structure And Maintenance Of Its Consistency

Changeable scale control strategy of organizations based on dynamic object connection model

Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change

We Are Grateful to Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form

Transition Trajectories for Market Structure and Firm Strategy in China

Research on Generalized Trajectory Theory

The complementarity of control formalization and control flexibility: The contingent effects of competitive turbulence

Coordination and Experimentation in M-Form and U-Form Organizations