Abstract:In the new business environment,characterized by increasing uncertainty and complexity,knowledge management is increasingly considered as an important source of sustainable competitive advantage for organizations.The ability to transfer existing knowledge within organization is one of the most strategic capabilities which organization possesses,and a principal source of sustainable competitive advantage.The issue of managing knowledge to organizations' benefit—identifying and leveraging knowledge within organizations to help them compete has been prompted.Over the last few years,there has been an upsurge in interest among scholars on the importance of knowledge-based resources and their role in organizations. In this study,the primary research goals are directed toward understanding the process through which knowledge is successfully transferred within organization,and to find out what the most critical determinants of knowledge transfer are and how these factors influence innovative performance.In order to address these issues,we propose and test a basic model of knowledge transfer that captures the relationship between knowledge transfer mechanism,the formalization of organizational structure,and innovative performance. Unlike previous research that focused on the antecedents of knowledge transfer,in this study,we investigated how knowledge transfer mechanisms(i.e.,coercive knowledge transfer mechanism and noncoercive knowledge transfer mechanism) and their interaction affect inter-firm knowledge transfer and innovative performance.A statistical analysis of questionnaire responses from 126 Chinese firms was performed.The results indicated that knowledge transfer mechanism and the formalization of organizational structure are critical for knowledge transfer.Specifically,coercive knowledge transfer mechanism,noncoercive knowledge transfer mechanism,and their interaction positively related to innovative performance.Moreover,the effects of coercive knowledge transfer mechanism and noncoercive knowledge transfer mechanism on innovative performance are moderated by the formalization of organizational structure.The relationship between noncoercive knowledge transfer mechanism and innovative performance across low,medium,and high levels of organizational structure formalization is inverted U-shaped.The relationship between coercive knowledge transfer mechanism and innovative performance across low,medium,and high levels of organizational structure formalization is U-shaped. In this study,we provide an exploratory investigation of the relationship between knowledge transfer mechanism,the formalization of organizational structure,and innovative performance.As a complement to previous research that focused on the antecedents of knowledge transfer and transfer success,we focused on how knowledge transfer mechanism and organizational structure impact innovative performance.Our results indicated that knowledge transfer mechanism significantly contributes to innovative performance.We also investigated the relatively unknown impact of the interaction effect of different knowledge transfer mechanisms.Our results indicate that the interaction effect on innovative performance is significant,indicating that coercive knowledge transfer mechanism and noncoercive knowledge transfer mechanism do interact with each other to influence innovative performance.Moreover,this study also examined the modulating role of organizational structure formalization in the relationship between knowledge transfer mechanism and innovative performance.The results indicate that the formalization of organizational structure is curvilinear with respect to the relationship between knowledge transfer mechanism and innovative performance. This paper contributes to this line of research by showing both direct and interaction effects of knowledge transfer mechanism on innovative performance,as well as the modulating effect of organizational structure formalization.These findings also have some implications that are potentially important for firm managers,especially in regard to the organizational activities in which knowledge transfer is critical.

Coordination and Experimentation in M-Form and U-Form Organizations

Coordinating Changes in M-form and U-form Organizations

Attribute Coordination in Organizations

Extra-role Behavior and Team Innovation Performance:A Multilevel Approach

We Are Grateful to Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form

Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form

An Experimental Study on Firm Organizational Change,HR Strategy and Change Coping Behaviour: an Organizational Learning Perspective

The Effect of Match or Mismatch between Individual and Organization Expectations on Expatriate Performance

Four Forms That Fit Most Organizations

Research on the Coordination Mechanism among Modular Organizations

Exploratory Learning and Exploitative Learning in Different Organizational Structures

The complementarity of control formalization and control flexibility: The contingent effects of competitive turbulence

A multiplex view of leadership structure in management teams

Adjusting Organization to Improve Coordination for Large Heterogeneous Multi-agent Teams.

An Empirical Study on the Relationship of Knowledge Transfer Mechanism,Organizational Structure, and Innovative Performance

The Study on the Organizational Model of Coordination Association

Bottom‐up Learning, Organizational Formalization, and Ambidextrous Innovation

Formal and Informal Control as Complement or Substitute? The Role of the Task Environment

Internal Commitment or External Collaboration? The Impact of Human Resource Management Systems on Firm Innovation and Performance

The mechanism to cope with the uncertainty in project management

An Empirical Study on the Structure of Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance