Understanding the Other and Self-observation:Modern Chinese People's Perception of Korea

Wang Yuanzhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6708.2007.02.004
2007-01-01
Abstract:The rise and fall of Korea was an important reference point for modern Chinese people in the transition from traditional sinocentrism to modern nationalism.Therefore,Chinese understandings of Korea were closely related to the evolution of modern ideology.The complicated international and domestic situation,conflicts between Eastern and Western ideology,and a rich historical memory presented modern Chinese with all manner of difficulties—both in sentiment and in ideology—in their perceptions of Korea.Firstly,regarding the downfall of the Korean empire,though Chinese people generally condemned the duplicitous and aggressive acts of Japanese imperialism,yet they always preferred to look for internal reasons leading to Korea's downfall,in order to alert their compatriots and encourage self-strengthening.Secondly,how was one to understand Korea's colonial modernity under Japanese rule? Some people took an affirmative,even laudatory view,while others recognized the suffering of the Korean people that lay behind the achievements of modernization.It was only when Japan occupied Northeast China that a basic unity was achieved on a thoroughly anti-colonialist stance.Thirdly,modern Chinese people's understandings of Korea were always greatly affected by historical memory,and the memory of suzerain-vassal relations strengthened the Chinese people's sense of responsibility for supporting the Korean independence movement.On the other hand,another reason why the Chinese people supported the movement was that they thought the Korean peninsula was geo-politically important to China and closely tied to the peace and security of China and indeed all of East Asia.The complexity of these understandings of Korea indicated the connection between understandings of the other and self-realization,and exerted a definite influence on the form of modern Chinese nationalism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?