Abstract:Background: Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression, antidepressant drugs are frequently used as first-line treatment in primary and secondary care settings. Milnacipran, a dual serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), is one of the antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care. Objectives: To assess the evidence for the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of milnacipran in comparison with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), heterocyclics, SSRIs and other newer antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression. Search strategy: The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis review group Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) were electronically searched in August 2008. References of relevant trials and other reviews were also checked. Trial databases of the drug-approving agencies and ongoing clinical trial registers for all published and unpublished trials were hand-searched in 2007. All relevant authors were contacted for supplemental data. No language restriction was applied. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing milnacipran with any other active antidepressive agents (including non-conventional agents such as herbal products like hypericum) as monotherapy in the acute phase of major depression were selected. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently checked eligibility, assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the eligible trials using a standardised data extraction form. The number of participants who responded to treatment or those who achieved remission were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, combining data from the included trials. Main results: A total of 16 randomised controlled trials (n=2277) were included in the meta-analysis.Despite the size of this sample, the pooled 95% confidence intervals were rather wide and there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy, acceptability and tolerability when comparing milnacipran with other antidepressive agents. However, compared with TCAs, patients taking milnacipran were associated with fewer dropouts due to adverse events (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.35 to 0.85). There was also some weak evidence to suggest that patients taking milnacipran experienced fewer adverse events of sleepiness/ drowsiness, dry mouth or constipation compared with TCAs. Authors' conclusions: Currently, there is inadequate evidence to conclude whether milnacipran is superior, inferior or the same as other antidepressive agents in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of major depression. However, there is some evidence in favour of milnacipran over TCAs in terms of dropouts due to adverse events (acceptability) and the rates of experiencing adverse events (tolerability). Information about other clinically meaningful outcomes such as cost-effectiveness and social functioning, including the ability to return to work, is lacking. Further study is needed to answer whether milnacipran would be the better choice of antidepressant for acute major depression.

A Comparison in Efficacy and Safety of Milnacipran with Fluoxetine in Chinese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

A comparative study of treatment of depression:Mirtazapine vs.fluoxepine

Efficacy and safety of olanzapine combined with fluoxetine in treatment of depression

Randomized,multicenter,double blind comparative trial of reboxetine in the treatment of depression with or without anxiety

The efficacy and safety of venlafaxine XR in treating patients with major depression in a multicenter,open-label, 16 week study

Venlafaxine vs clomipramine in treating major depression associated with anxiety

Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression

Comparison of Escitalopram with Citalopram in Treatment of Depression: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study

Study of Bupropion Hydrochloride Tablet and Fluoxetine in Treatment of Depression Multicenter Clinical Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Levomilnacipran Sustained Release in Moderate to Severe Major Depressive Disorder

Duloxetine Versus Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized Double-Blind Multicentre Controlled Study

Citalopram in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders: an Open Label, Multicenter Study in China

Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram in Treatment of Severe Depression in Chinese Population.

Control study of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in therapy of depression

Efficacy and Safety of Bupropion Hydrochloride Extended-Release Versus Escitalopram Oxalate in Chinese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.

Escitalopram Vs Citalopram: a Parallel Controlled Study for Depression

Treatment of Major Depressive Disorders with Generic Duloxetine and Paroxetine: a Multi-Centered, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation vs Citalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Trial

Randomized,multicenter,double Blind Comparative Trial of Jin-yu-kang Capsule in the Treatment of Mild and Moderate Depression

Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines combined with antidepressants for treatment of depression in adults: A multiple-treatment meta-analysis

Efficacy of fluoxetine combined with psychological intervention for treatment of depressive patients with insomnia