Abstract:Humans worldwide have long deplored hypocrisy, a concept that has been mentioned in texts dating back 100–1,000 years (e.g., the Analects of Confucius, the Tao Te Ching, the Bible, and the Qur'an). However, what influences the extent of hypocrisy attribution or counts as hypocrisy may differ as a function of culture. Previous studies have shown that Westerners attribute greater hypocrisy for within-person attitude–behavior inconsistency than East Asians. Building on this, we predict that East Asians' (vs. Westerners') hypocrisy attribution is more heavily influenced by social relationships. Consistent with past research, this can lead to greater leniency. However, as we show, this can also result in the novel finding we present that attributions of mild-to-moderate hypocrisy are made even when no explicit within-person attitude–behavior inconsistency is present. Across six experiments, we found that Koreans (vs. participants from the United States) attributed more hypocrisy to attitude-contradicting behavior when the person enacting the behavior was not the person who stated the attitude but was someone who shared social bonds with that person (i.e., cross-person, within-relationship attitude–behavior inconsistency; "relational hypocrisy"). Specifically, Koreans attributed more hypocrisy than Americans when a child's behavior contradicted their parent's views (Experiments 1a and 1b) or when attitude-contradicting behavior was enacted by the child of a close friend (Experiment 2). Experiments 3–5 replicated the findings from Experiments 1–2 using additional social contexts (e.g., a spousal relationship). Supplementary analyses showed that differences in hypocrisy attribution between Americans and Koreans were mediated by cultural differences in their perceptions of shared responsibility within relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Guilt, Shame, And Adjustment In 3 Cultures

A Multidimensional Approach to the Relationship Between Individualism-Collectivism and Guilt and Shame

Differentiating shame and guilt from a relational perspective: A cross-cultural study

Are self-conscious emotions about the self? Testing competing theories of shame and guilt across two disparate cultures.

Transferred Shame in the Cultures of Interdependent- Self and Independent Self

Cross-cultural invariances in the architecture of shame

Guilt Versus Shame: Distinguishing the Two Emotions from a Chinese Perspective

The Relationship Between Guilt and Shame——from the perspective of counterfactual thinking

Resting Heart Rate Variability Is Positively Associated With Proneness to Guilt but not Shame in Chinese Young Adults

Interdependent versus independent inconsistency: Cultural differences in how East Asian and Western people attribute hypocrisy.

Personal and Collective Culpability Judgment

Cultural differences in shame-focused attitudes towards mental health problems in Asian and Non-Asian student women

Similarities and Differences of Shame Experiences between Chinese and American College Students

Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others

Shame, Personality, And Social Anxiety Symptoms In Chinese And American Nonclinical Samples: A Cross-Cultural Study

Roles of guilt and culture in normative influence: testing moderated mediation in the anti-secondhand smoking context

Guilt, Shame and Academic Misconduct

The Effects of Locus of Control and Guilt and Shame on Counterfactual Thinking

Self-Esteem And Culture: Differences In Cognitive Self-Evaluations Or Affective Self-Regard?

A World of Blame to Go Around: Cross-Cultural Determinants of Responsibility and Punishment Judgments

Cultural differences in perceived social norms and social anxiety