Construction of Shame-Proneness Scale of Employee Malay People: A Study from Indonesia
Hijriyati Cucuani,Hendriati Agustiani,Marina Sulastiana,Diana Harding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S354439
IF: 3.974
2022-04-17
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Hijriyati Cucuani, 1, 3 Hendriati Agustiani, 1, 2 Marina Sulastiana, 1 Diana Harding 1 1 Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia; 2 Center for Psychological Innovation and Research, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia; 3 Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia Correspondence: Hijriyati Cucuani; Hendriati Agustiani, Email ; Purpose: Culture plays a role in determining how individuals interpret their experiences. In previous studies, the experience of shame has been associated with negative behavior. However, for Malays who interpret shame more positively, the experience of shame serves to inhibit negative behavior. Therefore, shame-proneness in Malays cannot be measured as it is measured in different cultures. Two studies in this research aimed to construct a measure of shame-proneness for Malays in a work context. This measuring instrument is devoted to the work context because so many situations cause shame in everyday life. By limiting the measurement of shame for employees, the conditions that arise in the measuring instrument can be more specific. Methods: In the first study, a qualitative study was conducted to explore the experience of shame in Malays. The second study used a quantitative method to construct a measuring instrument of shame that has good psychometric properties. Results: The results of in-depth interviews with nine Malay employees resulted in four indicators of shame in Malay people in the work context, namely, negative self-evaluation, withdrawal, perceiving negative evaluation from others, and motivation to change the self. In the second study, 456 Malay civil servants in Pekanbaru, Indonesia, were asked to respond to a 27-item shame-proneness scale based on these four indicators. Based on the exploratory factor analysis results, the four indicators narrowed down to three factors. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 18-item proneness scale with three factors was the best and showed acceptable goodness of fit. Conclusion: Shame-proneness scale of Malay employees scale was conducted in order to compose an instrument using a more comprehensive psychological approach. This has satisfactory psychometric properties and thus potentially measures the shame-proneness of Malay employees in Indonesia more accurately. Keywords: shame-proneness, measurement, employee Malay people Moral emotions play an important role in encouraging moral behavior 1,2 because they can direct people to behave in ways consistent with what society considers moral and appropriate. 3 Shame and guilt are the best represent moral emotions because they inhibit morally inappropriate behaviour. 4 Several previous studies explained that shame and guilt as moral emotions are not equivalent, where guilt motivates individuals in a positive direction, while shame makes individuals feel awry, 5 escape, 6 blame externally, 4 and other negative impacts. Shame as a painful feeling usually accompanied by feelings of worthlessness and helplessness 5 tend to make workers take counterproductive actions. 7 Several other studies on shame in the workplace came up with different results. Murphy & Kiffin-Petersen 8 found that shame is a discrete emotion that is considered influencing ethical behavior in the workplace because of its function in promoting interpersonal harmony and supporting social conformity and compliance with moral standards. Daniels and Robinson 9 explain that shame in the context of work is something powerful, showing how a person is aware of his identity as a worker and the important standards they must meet. Failure to meet standards attached to one's identity as a member of a profession or organization will cause embarrassment. Moreover, the negative self-evaluation after committing a moral violation that makes individuals feel ashamed positively correlates with moral identity. Therefore, people prone to shame are less likely to commit immoral acts at work like corruption. 10 One of the causes of the differences in the results of shame research is cultural differences. Su 11 emphasizes that culture plays an important role in determining how individuals interpret shame and guilt. Pyle 12 explains that culture has a major impact on individuals in their growth, development, and learning from their environment, including how they interpret shame. Individuals from individualist cultures with independent self-construal see guilt as an internal stan -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary