Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Effect of Early Intervention
WU Hao,SHEN Xiao-ming,LI Yun,TAO Zheng,ZHANG Feng-hua,CHEN Xiang-ping,JIN Xing-ming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2007.01.003
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the feasibility of universal newborn hearing screening(UNHS),and to evaluate the effect of early intervention on newborns with hearing loss. Methods A retrospective study of the newborn hearing screening in Shanghai from January 2002 to December 2005 was carried out.The total number of newborns,the coverage rate,the positive rate of first screening and repeated screening,the number with definite diagnosis,and the distribution of hearing-impaired newborns according to degree of hearing loss were analyzed.The screening was performed by using distortion product otoacoustic emission(DPOAE).First screening and repeated screening were carried out within 3 days and 42 days after birth,and those who failed the repeated screening were diagnosed at the Shanghai Children's Hearing and Speech Center within the age of three months.Children with a definite diagnosis were given intervention within 6 months.Follow-up and evaluation were performed from 6 months to 3 years of age,and comparison were made between the intervention group and non-intervention group. Results The number of newborns screened was 56 191(2002),82 662(2003),86 940(2004) and 121 460(2005),respectively.The coverage rate of first screening was 83.38%,93.93%,94.01% and 98.03%,and the positive rate was 12.53%,11.41%,12.00% and 11.92%,respectively.The coverage rate of repeated screening rate was 63.92%,63.47%,71.50% and 70.04%,and the positive rate was 10.40%,13.48%,11.0% and 10.74%,respectively.The number of newborns with a definite diagnosis was 125,128,129 and 433,respectively.The prevelence of hearing loss in UNHS was 2.35(815/347 253).The number of newborns with moderate or more severe bilateral hearing loss was 319(39.14%,319/815),among whom 194 had been followed up and 34 had received intervention up till June 2005.Thirty-one had not received intervention out of economic reasons.The development of speech and cognition was significantly different between the two groups(P0.05),with the development of children in the intervention group well performed almost like the normals.Conclusion It is feasible and effective to conduct UNHS with the help of government and related parties.The early intervention will definitely benefit those with hearing loss.