Abstract:A fundamental objective in Auditory Sciences is to understand how people learn to generalize auditory category knowledge in new situations. How we generalize to novel scenarios speaks to the nature of acquired category representations and generalization mechanisms in handling perceptual variabilities and novelty. The dual learning system (DLS) framework proposes that auditory category learning involves an explicit, hypothesis-testing learning system, which is optimal for learning rule-based (RB) categories, and an implicit, procedural-based learning system, which is optimal for learning categories requiring pre-decisional information integration (II) across acoustic dimensions. Although DLS describes distinct mechanisms of two types of category learning, it is yet clear the nature of acquired representations and how we transfer them to new contexts. Here, we conducted three experiments to examine differences between II and RB category representations by examining what acoustic and perceptual novelties and variabilities affect learners’ generalization success. Learners can successfully categorize different sets of untrained sounds after only eight blocks of training for both II and RB categories. The category structures and novel contexts differentially modulated the generalization success. The II learners significantly decreased generalization performances when categorizing new items derived from an untrained perceptual area and in a context with more distributed samples. In contrast, RB learners’ generalizations are resistant to changes in perceptual regions but are sensitive to changes in sound dispersity. Representational similarity modeling revealed that the generalization in the more dispersed sampling context was accomplished differently by II and RB learners. II learners increased representations of perceptual similarity and decision distance to compensate for the decreased transfer of category representations, whereas the RB learners used a more computational cost strategy by default, computing the decision-bound distance to guide generalization decisions. These results suggest that distinct representations emerged after learning the two types of category structures and using different computations and flexible mechanisms in resolving generalization challenges when facing novel perceptual variability in new contexts. These findings provide new evidence for dissociated representations of auditory categories and reveal novel generalization mechanisms in resolving variabilities to maintain perceptual constancy.

Dual-system Model of Category Learning

Multiple Systems of Category Learning From the Perspective of Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology

The Development of Category Learning Researches of Cognitive Neuroscience

Category Learning Blocking and Dual-processing Account

The Multiple Systems Theory in Category Learning

Dual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan.

A computational model of prefrontal and striatal interactions in perceptual category learning

The Cognitive Mechanism of Category Learning

A comment on a New Category Learning Model: SUSTAIN

Exploration, Distributed Attention, and Development of Category Learning

Distribution-dependent Representations in Auditory Category Learning and Generalization

Category Learning in a Recurrent Neural Network with Reinforcement Learning.

The Influence of the Relevant Dimension Number on the Learning in Two Category Structuresv

Attentional Bias in Human Category Learning: The Case of Deep Learning

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Category-based Feature Inference

Categorization in the Wild: Generalizing Cognitive Models to Naturalistic Data across Languages

Cognitive Category Learning.

On the interaction of prior knowledge and stimulus structure in category learning

Mechanisms underlying category learning in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex

Reconciling category exceptions through representational shifts

Improving Causality Induction with Category Learning