Abstract:Category learning performance is influenced by both the nature of the category's structure and the way category features are processed during learning. Shepard (1964, 1987) showed that stimuli can have structures with features that are statistically uncorrelated (separable) or statistically correlated (integral) within categories. Humans find it much easier to learn categories having separable features, especially when attention to only a subset of relevant features is required, and harder to learn categories having integral features, which require consideration of all of the available features and integration of all the relevant category features satisfying the category rule (Garner, 1974). In contrast to humans, a single hidden layer backpropagation (BP) neural network has been shown to learn both separable and integral categories equally easily, independent of the category rule (Kruschke, 1993). This "failure" to replicate human category performance appeared to be strong evidence that connectionist networks were incapable of modeling human attentional bias. We tested the presumed limitations of attentional bias in networks in two ways: (1) by having networks learn categories with exemplars that have high feature complexity in contrast to the low dimensional stimuli previously used, and (2) by investigating whether a Deep Learning (DL) network, which has demonstrated humanlike performance in many different kinds of tasks (language translation, autonomous driving, etc.), would display human-like attentional bias during category learning. We were able to show a number of interesting results. First, we replicated the failure of BP to differentially process integral and separable category structures when low dimensional stimuli are used (Garner, 1974; Kruschke, 1993). Second, we show that using the same low dimensional stimuli, Deep Learning (DL), unlike BP but similar to humans, learns separable category structures more quickly than integral category structures. Third, we show that even BP can exhibit human like learning differences between integral and separable category structures when high dimensional stimuli (face exemplars) are used. We conclude, after visualizing the hidden unit representations, that DL appears to extend initial learning due to feature development thereby reducing destructive feature competition by incrementally refining feature detectors throughout later layers until a tipping point (in terms of error) is reached resulting in rapid asymptotic learning.

Exploration, Distributed Attention, and Development of Category Learning

Temporal characteristics of overt attentional behavior during category learning

Systematic changes in neural selectivity reflect the acquired salience of category-diagnostic dimensions

On the interaction of prior knowledge and stimulus structure in category learning

The development of memory selection: When children have better memory than adults

Learning-Induced Changes in Attentional Allocation During Categorization: A Sizable Catalog of Attention Change As Measured by Eye Movements

Category Learning Selectively Enhances Representations of Boundary-Adjacent Exemplars in Early Visual Cortex

Attentional Bias in Human Category Learning: The Case of Deep Learning

Category structure and region-specific selective attention

The Role of Attention in Category Representation

Dissociable changes in functional network topology underlie early category learning and development of automaticity

The Development of Global-Level Categorization: Frequency Tagging EEG Responses

Attentional Selection and Suppression in Children and Adults.

Neural Specialization with Generalizable Representations Underlies Children's Cognitive Development of Attention.

Holding multiple category representations: The role of age, theory of mind, and rule switching in children’s developing cross-classification abilities

Learning Shapes Spatiotemporal Brain Patterns for Flexible Categorical Decisions

Dual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan.

Neural specialization with generalizable representations underlies children’s cognitive development of attention.

Automatic selection of eye tracking variables in visual categorization in adults and infants

Individual-specific strategies inform category learning

Reconciling categorization and memory via environmental statistics