Abstract:Designs for computer experiments in quantitative factors use columns with many levels. Filling the experimental space is their most important property, and there are many criteria that assess aspects of space‐filling. Recently, Tian and Xu proposed a stratification pattern for assessing the stratification‐related space‐filling properties of designs for quantitative experimental variables whose number of levels is a power of a – usually small – integer. Such designs have been named GSOAs, in generalization of the earlier proposal of strong – or stratum – orthogonal arrays (SOAs). Latin hypercube designs (LHDs) with a suitable number of levels are special cases of GSOAs. Tian and Xu proposed to use the stratification pattern as a means to ranking (G)SOAs. They reported a small simulation study in which arrays that fared well in that ranking performed well in predicting an unknown function. Shi and Xu refined the criterion and also demonstrated success of a design that fares well on their refined criterion. This paper explains the ideas behind the stratification pattern and the related ranking criteria. A practical example and several toy examples aid the illustration. The stratification pattern can be calculated using the R package SOAs, which does not only provide the pattern itself but also provides more detail in a dimension by weight table, in the spirit of the refinement by Shi and Xu.

Three-level and Mixed-Level Orthogonal Arrays for Lean Designs

Mixed-level designs with orthogonality and relatively optimal run order

Coarse optimization for complex systems: an application of orthogonal experiments

Optimal orthogonal designs for experiments with four-level and two-level factors

Some New Classes of Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs

Combining Two-Level and Three-Level Orthogonal Arrays for Factor Screening and Response Surface Exploration

Mixed-level column augmented uniform designs

Construction of Sliced Space-Filling Designs Based on Balanced Sliced Orthogonal Arrays

On the construction of nested orthogonal arrays with the adjacent numbers of levels

Construction of 2fi-optimal row-column designs

Construction of orthogonal maximin distance designs

Orthogonal Array Based Locally D-Optimal Designs for Binary Responses in the Presence of Factorial Effects

Approximation of Bounds on Mixed Level Orthogonal Arrays

Construction of balanced sliced orthogonal arrays

A new kid on the block: The stratification pattern for space‐filling, with dimension by weight tables

Sliced Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercube Designs

How One-Factor-at-a-Time Experimentation Can Lead to Greater Improvements Than Orthogonal Arrays

Construction of Asymmetric Orthogonal Arrays With High Strength

Additional Extensions of the OO Methodology

Central Limit Theorems for Four New Types of U-Designs