Comparison of Three Topical Anesthesia for Hemodynamic Responses in Use of Bronchofibroscopy Intubation

SUN Zhi-hua,LIU Zhan-mei,GUO Qu-lian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2010.05.030
2010-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To compare the effects of three topical anesthesia for hemodynamic responses in use of bronehofibreseopy intubation. [Methods]Sixty ASA Ⅰ orⅡadults (31 males,29 females) aged 18-59 years,weighing 43-79 kg sehedtded for elective oral cavity surgery in use of bronchofibroscopy intubation under topical anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups (n=20 each):group Ⅰ throat and part trachea topical anesthesia (B); group Ⅱ midazolam (M);group Ⅲ throat and trachea topical anesthesia (H). Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.04 mg/ks in group Ⅱ,2%lidocaine 2 mL trachea topical anesthesia was given by thyrocricocenlesis in group Ⅲ.Noninvasive BP and HR were record and RPP (SBPxHRl was calculated before baseline and immediately intubation during bronehofibroseopy intubation and tracheal intubation. [Results]BP,HR and RPP were significantly decreased after induction of anesthesia as compare to baseline values in group M (P<0.05),while they remained stable in group B and H.The bronehofibrescopy intubation responses were strongest in group B and M.But these responses were least in group H,SBP and HR reached their highest values significantly in group B than in group H and M.People of choking in group H is fewer than these of group B and M (P<0.05). [Conclusion]2%lidocaine 2 mL Throat and trachea tepical anesthesia Can effectively inhibiting hemodynamic responses in use of bronehofi broseopy intubation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?