The clinic observation of endotracheal intubation with discope intubating device versus macintosh direct laryngoscope in general anesthesia patients

WANG Xiao-liang,BAO Hong-guang,ZHAO Qian,XU Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2012.04.086
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with discope intubating device versus macintosh direct laryngoscope(MDLS)in general anesthesia patients.Methods Eighty adult patients without difficult airways or cardiopulmonary diseases and scheduled for time-selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups(n=40 for each).The discope group received tracheal intubation with discope,while the MDLS group with macintosh direct laryngoscope.Changes in systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),mean airway pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR)and tracheal intubation time were measured before anesthesia induction(T1),after anesthesia induction(T2),immediately after intubation(T3),1 minute after intubation(T4)and 5 minutes after intubation(T5).Rate pressure product(RPP)were calculated.Results All procedures were successful on the first attempt.Compared with pre-induction(T1),MAP and RPP in both two groups significantly decreased after anesthetic induction(P<0.05).However,compared with T1,MAP and RPP did not increase significantly(P>0.05)at T3 and T4 in discope group,while MAP,RPP and HR did increase significantly(P<0.05)at T3 and T4 in MDLS group.The HR at T1,T2,T3,T4 and T5 in discope group did not change remarkably(P>0.05).In MDLS group,MAP,HR and RPP at T3 and T4 were significant higher than those in scope group(P<0.05).Conclusions In comparison to Macintosh direct laryngoscope,tracheal intubation with discope laryngoscope resulted in less alterations in hemodynamic responses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?