Abstract:Powerful technological platforms — artificial intelligence, gene editing, robotics — are driving a new wave of global innovation, with China and the United States emerging as the “G2” in these and other areas of technology. The United States is ahead overall, but its technology investments and human resources will be soon exceeded by those in China. Still, we project that Chinese innovation will not catch up in some technologies for decades, making some sectors dependent on critical foreign inputs. Political differences between China and the United States, some zero-sum aspects of technological competition, the role of the state in Chinese innovation, and China’s technological vulnerabilities have led the United States to pursue aggressive, and by past standards illegal, interventions in trade. Some decoupling of the technological relationship is underway. Yet technological disengagement is likely to be slower and harder than commonly expected. Third countries — accounting for 60 percent of world GDP— have large stakes in preventing extensive decoupling; China could retain their business by pursuing open economic policies and reforms.In sharp contrast with recent trends, academic research argues for an “open innovation” regime that emphasizes vigorous flows of ideas, researchers, and products, in order to enhance the pace and utilization of innovation everywhere. Yet in the current political setting the open model can lead to technology leakages, creating commercial and national security risks. These issues dominate current policy discussions and generate strong headwinds against open policies.The policy challenges for China and the world are to reduce the scope of current decoupling and to build foundations for more open policies in the future. This requires resuming, to the extent possible, rules-based trade in advanced products and technologies, while establishing safeguards—narrowly-defined controls on trade and investment — that limit national security risks. Technological cooperation in the long run will depend on renewed collaboration among leaders and better tools for managing risks.

Meet the Challenge of Offensive Internet Freedom Strategy:Competition and Cooperation between China and the US in Global Cyberspace

Cyber Security and the Non-traditional Factor is Sino—US Socurity Relations

President Obama and China: cyber diplomacy and strategy for a new era

China–U.S. cyber-crisis management

Cybersecurity In The Chinese Context Changing Concepts, Vital Interests, And Prospects For Cooperation

How to Think about Cyber Sovereignty: the Case of China

Competition,Mutual-trust and Differences in Administration and Control——A Study on the US Asia-Pacific strategy Adjustment from the View of China-US Interaction

Digital Confrontation between USA and China: Economic and Political Dimensions

China'S Alternative Roles in Countering International Economic Cyber Espionage

Cyber Sovereignty and the Governance of Global Cyberspace

Bipolar Rivalry in the Early Digital Age

From Partner to Competitor: The Proximization Analysis of the National Security Strategy of the United States of America from Three Administrations

Global Cyber Governance China'S Contribution And Approach

U.S. & China Approaches to Global Internet Governance: "New Bipolarity" in Terms of "the Network Society"

An Onslaught Against China ' s Diplomacy and Security from the Obama Administration ' s Adjustments to its Asia-Pacific Strategy

United States-China Technological Rivalry

Global Cyber Governance in China: Towards Building a Community of Shared Future in Cyberspace

From Mutual Hedging to All-Round Competition — The Strategic Transformation of Sino-US relations

U.S.-India Cyber Security Cooperation:External Changes,Internal Motivations and Growing Incoherence Chinese Full Text

Behind the Huawei sanction: national security, ideological prejudices or something else?

The Biden Administration's Scientific and Technological Competition Strategy toward China