Abstract:China suffers a variety of natural disasters every year. The frequency and consequences of these disasters have risen due to climate change, resulting in increased economic losses. This project first examines the existing public system of disaster relief and recovery including both direct government subsidy and public insurance system through extensive documentary study, focus group discussions and in-person interviews. We found that the usefulness of direct government subsidies is limited by the availability of public financial resources. Direct government subsidies are largely reserved for those who do not have the capability for self- relief and recovery. For those who do receive government subsidies, the amount of assistance is only sufficient for basic housing needs instead of restoring the way of life people had before a natural disaster. Public insurance, on the other hand, only applies to rural areas and has a maximum coverage of only about CNY 18,000. As with direct government subsidies, the purpose of public insurance is meeting basic needs, instead of helping people go back to the life they used to have. Furthermore, the premium of the public insurance system is heavily subsidized and not related to risk. This practice has been criticized for watering down economic incentives for proactive risk management and emergency response capacity building (Gurenko and Lester 2004; Heinz Center 2000; Yin, Kunreuther, and White 2011). The limitations of the public approach create a space for private insurance. In this paper, we investigate how China’s insurance industry (as suppliers) and Chinese people (as consumers) view natural disaster insurance. We conducted in-person interviews with insurance companies that are involved in the property insurance market in China. Insurance companies hesitate to offer insurance policy against natural disasters because of institutional barriers (e.g., natural disaster coverage is not considered a separate category, and existing accounting and tax regulations), low demand from consumers and the ambiguity associated with natural disaster. Our analysis of the demand for insurance is based on a field survey, which includes a choice- experiment of insurance selection. We found that people have a low demand for insurance because of three major reasons: a) the perception of “it won’t happen to me”, b) budgetary constraint, and c) a deep distrust in the insurance industry. We found that people tend to avoid insurance offered by small-scale insurance companies and strongly favor government insurance. This suggests that the establishment of natural disaster insurance should be initiated by government in China. We also found that one’s willingness to pay (WTP) for natural disaster insurance would significantly increase if one has high risk perception, and has experienced natural disasters. Our analyses suggest that neither the public nor private approach present an adequate solution to the challenge of financing natural disaster losses in China. Government-business collaboration may provide a viable alternative. Based on our findings, we discuss the roles that government and the private sector should play in a collaborative system.

Market Failure in the Forestry Insurance in China and Policy Solutions——Based on the Study of Forestry Insurance in Fujian

Market Failures,Policy-oriented Agricultural Insurance and Localization Schemas:Comparative Study of the Agricultural Insurance at Zhejiang,Shanghai and Suzhou

Policy farmer house insurance,social welfare benefits and performance appraisal——Based on micro-data of 499 rural households in Zhejiang

Policy research on the development of forest insurance

Subsidies, Welfare and Policy-oriented Agricultural Insurance: an Intensive Study Based on Welfare Economics

On How to Promote Policy Forestry Insurance

PPP Model in Forest Insurance Application Management Pattern Innovation

Impact of Tenure Reform on Forest Management Model: the Case of Fujian province

Financial Subsidies to Forestry Insurance Program Design——Taking Heilongjiang State Farms for Example

The research report on the pilot program of fiscal subsidy for forest insurance premium in six provinces

Evaluating financing risk for forest recreation value development project—A case study focused on S National Forest Park in Fujian Province

Practice and research progress on agriculture insurance in China during the past ten years.

Credit Rationing for Forestry Professional Cooperatives: Evidence from China’s Fujian Province

Analysis on Cooperation Between Banks and Insurance Companies in China Rural Areas

Empirical Study of Reform and Development in the Key State-owned Forest Area

Asymmetric Information and Forest Management

Analysis of Countermeasure and Implementation of Forest Right Mortgage Loan Business in Agricultural Bank of China

Study of Disaster Insurance in Japan and Thoughts of the Development of China's Natural Disaster Insurance

Insurance Approach for Financing Extreme Climate Event Losses in China: A Status Analysis

Post-reform Forestland Markets in China

The Idea of Establishing Government-Funded Agricultural Catastrophe Reserve System in China