Effect of ‘drug Holiday’ on Blood Pressure Control: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Trial of Amlodipine Versus Felodipine Extended Release in Chinese Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

Dayi Hu,Xiuli Zhao,Xin He,Daning Tao,Shoulan Wang,Guojing Wei,Zhiyong Qiu,Wanyi Li,Yin Liu,Zhaoxia Li,Giulan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000048941
2001-01-01
Heart Drug
Abstract:Objective: To compare the antihypertensive effect and safety of amlodipine and felodipine extended release (ER). Methods: Seventy-six patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomized to two groups in a double-blind manner. One group was treated with amlodipine 5.0–10.0 mg/day (group 1), and the other group with felodipine ER 5.0–10.0 mg/day (group 2), for 12 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring at baseline and after treatment was used to evaluate drug efficacy and blood pressure (BP) changes during a ‘drug holiday’ (48 h). Results: Diastolic BP was reduced in the amlodipine group by 15.1 mm Hg (to a final BP of 84.8 mm Hg) and in the felodipine ER group by 15.3 mm Hg (to a final BP of 85.0 mm Hg). Efficacy was considered to be achieved in 83.8% of patients in group 1 and in 87.9% of patients in group 2 (not significant). The number of patients controlled at the starting dose was 28 in group 1 and 19 in group 2 (p < 0.01). In group 1, BP remained below 140/90 mm Hg 24–48 h after the missed dose, and 24-hour ABP was not significantly different from that before the missed doses. In group 2, BP was above 140/90 mm Hg after the missed dose, and both BP and 24-hour ABP were statistically significantly higher than those before the missed doses. Adverse reactions were infrequent in both groups. Conclusions: Both amlodipine and felodipine ER are effective, safe, reliable and well tolerated in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. BP was well controlled in group 1 24–48 h after the missed dose. The fluctuation of BP in group 2, however, was significantly worse than that in group 1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?