Abstract:Background: Current hypertension guidelines recommend combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker with a calcium-channel blocker or thiazide diuretic as initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with monotherapy uncontrolled hypertension. However, to what extent these two different combinations are comparable in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety remains under investigation, especially in the Chinese population. We investigated the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of the amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies in Chinese patients. Methods: In a multi-center, randomized, actively controlled, parallel-group trial, we enrolled patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension from July 2018 to June 2021 in 20 hospitals and community health centers across China. Of the 894 screened patients, 560 eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine/benazepril 5/10 mg (n = 282) or benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide 10/12.5 mg (n = 278), with 213 and 212 patients, respectively, who completed the study and had a valid repeat ambulatory BP recording during follow-up and were included in the efficacy analysis. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 24 weeks of treatment in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP. Adverse events including symptoms and clinically significant changes in physical examinations and laboratory findings were recorded for safety analysis. Results: In the efficacy analysis (n = 425), the primary outcome, 24-h ambulatory systolic BP reduction, was - 13.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in the amlodipine/benazepril group and - 12.3 ± 1.2 mmHg in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group, with a between-group difference of - 1.51 (p = 0.36) mmHg. The between-group differences for major secondary outcomes were - 1.47 (p = 0.18) in 24-h diastolic BP, - 2.86 (p = 0.13) and - 2.74 (p = 0.03) in daytime systolic and diastolic BP, and - 0.45 (p = 0.82) and - 0.93 (p = 0.44) in nighttime systolic and diastolic BP. In the safety analysis (n = 560), the incidence rate of dry cough was significantly lower in the amlodipine/benazepril group than in the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide group (5.3% vs 10.1%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The amlodipine/benazepril and benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide dual therapies were comparable in ambulatory systolic BP lowering. The former combination, compared with the latter, had a greater BP-lowering effect in the daytime and a lower incidence rate of dry cough. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03682692. Registered on 18 September 2018.

A3704 CHINA STudy of Valsartan/amlodipine Fixed-Dose Combination-Based Long-Term Blood Pressure Management in HypertenSive Patients

China STudy of Valsartan/amlodipine Fixed-Dose Combination-Based Long-Term Blood Pressure Management in HypertenSive Patients: a One-Year Registry (china STATUS III)

Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination in 11,422 Chinese Patients with Hypertension: an Observational Study

[A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Comparing a Fixed Dose Combination of Telmisartan 80 Mg Plus Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 Mg to Telmisartan 80 Mg in Chinese Hypertensive Patients Who Failed to Respond Adequately to Telmisartan 80 Mg].

Clinical Study of Olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide Compound Tablet in Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertensive Patients Who Did Not Reach Goal with Olmesartan

G-002 AMLODIPINE/VALSARTAN 5/160 MG VERSUS VALSARTAN 160 MG IN PREDOMINANTLY CHINESE PATIENTS WITH STAGE 1 OR 2 ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED ON VALSARTAN 160 MG MONOTHERAPY

Amlodipine/valsartan 5/160mg Versus Valsartan 160mg in Chinese Hypertensives

Effect on Blood Pressure Control of Switching from Valsartan Monotherapy to Losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in Asian Patients with Hypertension: Results of a Multicentre Open-Label Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil-Amlodipine Besylate Tablet in Chinese Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Center, Real-World Study

Efficacy and Tolerability of Once-Daily 160 Mg Valsartan in Chinese Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension.

Efficacy and tolerability of a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan in Asian hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with valsartan monotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Allisartan for the Treatment of Primary Hypertension

A18728 Combination of Amlodipine with Diuretics or Telmisartan in High-risk Hypertensive Patients

Postmarketing surveillance study of benazepril in chinese patients with hypertension: An open-label, experimental, epidemiologic study

Comparison of two single-pill dual combination antihypertensive therapies in Chinese patients: a randomized, controlled trial

Effect of combining valsartan and amlodipine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by hypertension

Long-Term Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Hypertensive Patients As Assessed by Clinic, Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Measurements

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Hypertension Patients: Real-World Experiences on Different Ages, Drug Doses, and Renal Functions.

Efficacy and Effectiveness of Valsartan/amlodipine and Valsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Randomized Controlled Versus Observational Studies

Efficacy and safety of a single-pill versus free combination of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in Chinese patients with hypertension

Therapeutic Efficacy of Valsartan and Valsartan/hctz in Mild to Moderate Hypertensive Patients