Methodology Comparison For Effective Lai Retrieving Based On Digital Hemispherical Photograph In Rice Canopy

Lianqing Zhou,Guiying Pan,Zhou Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18336-2_9
2011-01-01
Abstract:The paper investigates methodology comparisons for retrieving effective leaf area index (LAI) using digital hemispherical photograph (DHP) in rice canopy. A set of self-making DHP instrument equipped with a fish-eye Len is utilized to acquire DHP in rice canopy, and some self-developing DHP processing procedures are utilized to pre-process DHP and extract effective LAI from DHP (LAI(DHP)) rapidly. Based on Beer-Lambert's law and gap fraction that computed from DHP, four methods of single zenith angle (SZA), Lang, Mill formula(Mt) and iterative formula(IF) are used to derive LAI(DHP)(effective LAI from them are called LAI(SZA), LAI(Lang) LAI(MF) and LAI(IF),respectively). LAI(SZA), LAI(Lang), LAI(MF) and LAI(IF) are inter-compared and are also compared with from AccuPAR LP-80(LAI(APAR)) and direct manual method (LAI(direct)). It is found that, in general, LAI(SZA), LAI(Lang) LAI(MF) and LAI(IF) are similar to LAI(APAR), but slightly lower than LAIdirect. During their intercomparsion, LAI(Lang) is more similar to LAIAPAR than other three and LAI(MF) is more similar to LAI(direct), while LAI(SZA) and LAI(Lang) are almost the same. It is implied that Lang method outperformed the other three when compared with AccuPAR LP-80 and Mill formula method outperformed the other three when compared with direct manual measure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?