Estimation of LAI with the LiDAR Technology: A Review

Yao Wang,Hongliang Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203457

IF: 5

2020-10-21

Remote Sensing

Abstract:Leaf area index (LAI) is an important vegetation parameter. Active light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology has been widely used to estimate vegetation LAI. In this study, LiDAR technology, LAI retrieval and validation methods, and impact factors are reviewed. First, the paper introduces types of LiDAR systems and LiDAR data preprocessing methods. After introducing the application of different LiDAR systems, LAI retrieval methods are described. Subsequently, the review discusses various LiDAR LAI validation schemes and limitations in LiDAR LAI validation. Finally, factors affecting LAI estimation are analyzed. The review presents that LAI is mainly estimated from LiDAR data by means of the correlation with the gap fraction and contact frequency, and also from the regression of forest biophysical parameters derived from LiDAR. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can be used to effectively estimate the LAI and vertical foliage profile (VFP) within plots, but this method is affected by clumping, occlusion, voxel size, and woody material. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) covers relatively large areas in a spatially contiguous manner. However, the capability of describing the within-canopy structure is limited, and the accuracy of LAI estimation with ALS is affected by the height threshold and sampling size, and types of return. Spaceborne laser scanning (SLS) provides the global LAI and VFP, and the accuracy of estimation is affected by the footprint size and topography. The use of LiDAR instruments for the retrieval of the LAI and VFP has increased; however, current LiDAR LAI validation studies are mostly performed at local scales. Future research should explore new methods to invert LAI and VFP from LiDAR and enhance the quantitative analysis and large-scale validation of the parameters.

environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: **How to effectively estimate the Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Vertical Foliage Profile (VFP) of vegetation using LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) technology, and analyze the factors affecting LAI estimation and verification methods**.

Specifically, the main objectives of the paper include the following aspects:

1. **Introduce the LiDAR system and its data pre - processing methods**
- The paper details different types of LiDAR systems (such as discrete - return, full - waveform, and single - photon counting), as well as their application characteristics on ground (TLS), aerial (ALS), and satellite (SLS) platforms.
- At the same time, it discusses the pre - processing procedures for point - cloud data and full - waveform data, such as data registration, noise removal, ground filtering, and waveform smoothing.

2. **Summarize LAI estimation methods**
- Based on LiDAR data, estimate LAI through its correlation with gap fraction or contact frequency.
- LAI can also be estimated by regression analysis of forest biophysical parameters (such as canopy height and leaf density) extracted from LiDAR data.

3. **Analyze LAI verification methods and limitations**
- Evaluate the performance of LiDAR data from different platforms in LAI verification, and point out the problems in the verification process, such as sampling scale limitations, terrain influence, and insufficient data quality.

4. **Explore the factors affecting LAI estimation**
- Analyze the characteristics of LiDAR data from different platforms (TLS, ALS, SLS) and their influence on the accuracy of LAI estimation. For example:
- TLS is affected by clumping, occlusion, voxel size, and woody materials.
- ALS has a large coverage area but limited ability to describe the internal structure of the canopy, and its accuracy is affected by height thresholds, sampling scales, and echo types.
- SLS provides LAI and VFP information on a global scale, but is greatly affected by footprint size and terrain.

5. **Look forward to future research directions**
- Propose the need to develop new methods to invert LAI and VFP from LiDAR data, and enhance the quantitative analysis and large - scale verification capabilities of these parameters.

### Core formulas involved
In full - waveform data processing, the paper mentions a Gaussian decomposition algorithm for waveform decomposition:
$$
\min \left\{ \int \left| f(x) - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} |a_i| \exp \left( -\frac{(x - \mu_i)^2}{2\sigma_i^2} \right) \right|^2 dx \right\}
$$
where:
- $f(x)$ is the LiDAR waveform;
- $a_i$, $\mu_i$, and $\sigma_i$ are the amplitude, position, and width of the $i$ - th Gaussian peak after decomposition, respectively;
- $n$ is the total number of Gaussian peaks after decomposition.

This formula decomposes a complex waveform into a series of Gaussian peaks by minimizing the sum of squared errors, thereby helping to identify the reflection signals of the ground and other features.

### Summary
The core problem of the paper is to explore how to use LiDAR technology to estimate LAI and VFP more accurately, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of existing methods and the influencing factors. At the same time, the paper also emphasizes that future research needs to focus on large - scale verification and new method development directions.