Abstract:Our perception of illusory shapes, such as the classic Kanizsa triangle, is thought to reflect the visual system's capacity to fill in missing information associated with fragmented or partially occluded objects. Previous work has suggested that such 'modal' filling-in arises at relatively early stages of visual processing, prior to the allocation of focused attention, but few studies have examined whether attention influences neural responses to illusory shapes. Here we asked whether spatial attention affects neural activity evoked by illusory shapes by having participants focus on stimuli presented in one visual field (left or right), while ignoring those on the other side. In two separate experiments, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs; Experiment 1) and event-related potentials (ERPs; Experiment 2), elicited by a Kanizsa square in one hemifield and a competing control stimulus, matched for all relevant physical features, in the other. In Experiment 1, the inducers used to construct the Kanizsa and control stimuli flickered at unique frequencies (10 and 13.33 Hz) to elicit SSVEPs. In Experiment 2, segments were removed briefly from static circular placeholders within the left and right visual hemifields to induce ERPs. In both experiments, participants were instructed to attend covertly to the stimulus on the left or right side to detect brief contrast changes of the inducers. SSVEP analyses revealed that illusory shapes that were ignored yielded a significantly larger neural response than those elicited by non-illusory control stimuli. By contrast, when the stimuli were attended, neural responses to the illusory and control stimuli were statistically indistinguishable. Consistent with these steady-state findings, results of the ERP analyses revealed that evoked responses to illusory shapes emerged earlier relative to control stimuli when they were ignored than when they were attended. Taken together the findings suggest that neural activity associated with modal completion is reliably modulated by spatial attention. Specifically, we show that neural responses to actively ignored illusory shapes are elicited earlier and are sustained at a higher amplitude than responses to control stimuli. This advantage for ignored shapes might reflect adaptive signalling of the presence of an object available for future goal-directed behaviour.

Psychophysical End-stopping Associated with Line Targets

Spatial-frequency and orientation tuning in psychophysical end-stopping.

Spatial Scaling of End-stopped Perceptive Fields: Differences in Neural Bases of End-zones, Flanks and Centers

Neural Suppression of Distractors Surrounding the Spotlight: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Cortical end-stopped perceptive fields: evidence from dichoptic and amblyopic studies.

The Time Course of Psychophysical End-Stopping.

End Stopping and Length Tuning in Psychophysical Spatial Filters

Spatial Facilitation Predicted with End-Stopped Spatial Filters

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects

Psychophysical Evidence for Competition Between Real and Illusory Contour Processing

Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system

Both Cognitive Factors and Local Inhibition Mediate the Effect of a Surrounding Frame in Visual Search for Oriented Bars

Consistent metacognitive efficiency and variable response biases in peripheral vision

Late disruption of central visual field disrupts peripheral perception of form and color

Effects of spatial location on distractor interference

Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination

A Psychophysical Test of the Saliency Map in V1

Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials

Top-Down Modulation of Lateral Interactions in Early Vision

Top-down interference in visual search