Evidence-Based Medical and Clinical Study of MRCP for Obstructive Jaundice Disease
WU Mei,GUO Qi-yong,WANG Xiao-ming,MO Lei,CHENG Ming-wang,JIANG Xin-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6273.2006.08.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To perform a meta-analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic curves(ROC)to compare current noninvasive imaging methods,such as ultrasonography(US),computed tomography(CT),magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) in the detection of obstructive jaundice disease.Mathods: 1.A MEDLINE literature search was performed.Articles were included if(a) US,CT and/or MRCP were performed for evaluation of Obstructive jaundice disease(b) Pathological results,operating findings or clinical and laboratorial examination results were the reference standards and(c) absolute numbers of true-positive,false-negative,true-negative and false-positive results were available or derivable.The k value was calculated as a measure of agreement between extracted variables and quality score.Funnel plot and Summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC) were obtained and a covariate analysis was used to evaluate the influence of patient or study-related factors on sensitivity.2.We collected 105 patients suspected with cholangiopancreatic disease.All patients were detected with MR.Of them,65 patients underwent US examination.Additional computed tomography for 59 patients,of them,Ultrasound was performed in 31 patients.True positive rate and false positive rate were calculated,respectively.We analysed the data with ROC.According to location and cause of the obstruction,sensitivity,specificity and likelihood ratio were calculated,respectively.Results: 1.The funnel plot demonstrated a symmetric funnel-shaped distribution for the CT and MRCP studies.SROC analysis demonstrated better discriminatory power for MRCP than for US and CT.The value of Q* for MRCP(0.9256)was higher than that for US(0.8765)and CT(0.8606),but there was no significant difference between MRCP and CT(Z=0.33,P0.05).Covariate factors had no influence on sensitivity by covariate analysis.2.ROC curve showed MRCP curve lied in top left corner and demonstrated better discriminatory power for MRCP than for US and CT.Areas under the ROC curve(AZ) of Ultrasound,CT and MRCP were 0.981,0.901and 0.985,all AZ values of them,higher than 0.9.But there was no significant difference between MRCP and CT(Z=0.75,P0.05).The sensitivity of MRCP in distinguishing the various pancreato-biliary tumors and stones was significantly higher than that of US and CT(p0.05).Conclusion: MRCP is considered to be superior to US and CT for the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice disease.