A Comparative Study of Hedging in the Results Section of English and Chinese Medical Research Articles

WU Jiu-ju,JIANG Yue
2013-01-01
Abstract:To investigate the difference in hedging in Chinese and English medical research articles,we randomly selected 20English medical research articles and 20Chinese ones,extracted their Results section,and built up Corpus CH and Corpus EN.Then we make a comparative study of hedging in the corpora.The results indicate that,firstly,on the whole,there are more hedges in Corpus EN than in Corpus CH,and the difference is statistically significant.It indicates that English-speaking researchers and writers use hedges more frequently than Chinese researchers and writers.Secondly,in terms of different categories of hedges,there is a significant difference in the use of shields and approximators between Corpus CH and Corpus EN,with Corpus EN having more shields and approximators.Besides,there is no emotionally-charged intensifier,author's personal involvement or com-pound hedges in Corpus CH.On the contrary,Corpus EN has some,and the highest frequency per 1000words reaches 0.48.We argue that such differences may due to Chinese traditional culture and the concepts supported by Chinese academic circles.By carrying out this study,we hope that we can assist Chinese researchers and workers understand and use hedges appropriately in their reading and writing medical research articles.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?