A Diachronic Study of Hedging in English Medical Research Articles(1990±2009)
Jiang Yue,Kou Ying
2011-01-01
Abstract:To investigate if occurrence frequency of hedging changes in response to the progress of time,we have compared hedging in 50 medical research articles from SCI journals(IF≥20),25 from 1990—1994(Corpus A) and 25 from 2005—2009(Corpus B).Compared with Corpus A,Corpus B shows an overall decline in the use of hedging.Hedging used in the Introduction,Result and Discussion sections decreases to some extent whereas hedging used in the Method section increases despite the overall decline.In addition,we have found some changes in the use of different types of hedges.For example,there is a decrease in the use of shields,personal-involvers,emotionally-charged intensifiers and compound hedges.On the other hand,there is a slight increase in the use of approximators.Conclusively,we argue that there has been less hedging in medical discourse due to the advances in medical apparatus,improved accuracy and determinacy in medical assessment and clinical treatment techniques,which,in turn,may result in less indeterminacy in diagnosis and judgment in medical research and clinical diagnosis.The result of this reduced indeterminacy may finally be reflected in language,namely,less vagueness and more confidence in medical discourse and,thus less hedging as well.Therefore,medical researchers would rather choose to minimize the distance between themselves and the reader,as well as the editors by using less hedging.However,despite the improved accuracy,determinacy and more confidence,medical writers still use a lot of approximators to make their data and conclusions more convincing.