System of Preservation of Evidence Should Be Added in Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Zhang Zetao
2012-01-01
Abstract:When it is difficult to obtain the evidence,such as the evidence would be disappear,fabricated,altered and concealed in criminal cases,the parties,the defenders and the victims all can apply to the special organs to take some preventive measures to get the evidence.We can call this the system of preservation of evidence in criminal cases.However,there is no legal provision about this system not only in both current and revised criminal procedural law but also in its judicial interpretation.And nobody pays attention on the principles and contents about this system in the academic circle,which has caused many deviations from this system. There exist some reasons to add this system to our criminal procedure law.Firstly,there are essential differences between the preservation of evidence and the applying for collecting evidence.The latter is unlikely to replace the former,and the former can compensate for the inner defects of the latter.Secondly,the preservation of evidence can make up for the deficiency of the obtaining means of evidence of the defender.It can avoid the lost and broken of the evidence,and then reduce the random of collecting evidences by the prosecutors.Thirdly,it can free the defendants who are innocent of all the pain in litigation as soon as possible.And at last,criminal preservation of evidence would make the legal system more systematic,normative and scientific. Nowadays,many countries and areas have provided the system of criminal preservation of evidence.Chinese criminal procedure law should add such system not only on the legislative and judicial situations in China but also on the experiences of the other countries and areas.The people's procuratorate should be the approval authority of the application for evidence preservation.The applicant should include the suspect,defendant,defender,victim and his legal representatives.The application should satisfy the basic conditions of relevancy and urgency.The people's procuratorate should examine and dispose without delay after it receives the application.If a decision has been made to reject the application,the applicant may apply for reconsideration.If the procuratorates do not take actions when they should,the court should make inferences against the accusation if the applicants interpose an objection and produce evidences to prove it.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?