On the Problem of Reference of Description and Name: From the Point of View of Contextualism

CHEN Xiao-ping
2012-01-01
Abstract:The referential function of names is closely related to descriptions and depends greatly on context. Context can be divided into world-contexts, identifying contexts and communicational contexts. In a world-context, a name refers to an object indirectly through a finite number of descriptions to realize its denoting function. In an identifying context, it refers to an object directly through open cluster descriptions to realize its designating function. Both denotation and designation are called "reference" which is the function of a subject. In a communicational context, when a name is wrongly used, it could have the attributive function which is also function of a predicate by nature. Open cluster descriptions do not have descriptive function but unfold as a causal-historical chain and provide a specific and dynamic context, namely an identifying context, for a name referring to an object directly. A world-context is a comparatively abstract and static context. A communicational context is an ostensive context in nature. In different contexts, a name and description embodies different functions respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?