Abstract:Importance Surgical site infections (SSIs)—especially anastomotic dehiscence—are major contributors to morbidity and mortality after rectal resection. The role of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation (MOABP) in preventing complications of rectal resection is currently disputed. Objective To assess whether MOABP reduces overall complications and SSIs after elective rectal resection compared with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) plus placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 university hospitals in Finland between March 18, 2020, and October 10, 2022. Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective resection with primary anastomosis of a rectal tumor 15 cm or less from the anal verge on magnetic resonance imaging were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who were randomly allocated to and underwent elective rectal resection with an anastomosis. Interventions Patients were stratified according to tumor distance from the anal verge and neoadjuvant treatment given and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MOABP with an oral regimen of neomycin and metronidazole (n = 277) or MBP plus matching placebo tablets (n = 288). All study medications were taken the day before surgery, and all patients received intravenous antibiotics approximately 30 minutes before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall cumulative postoperative complications measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index. Key secondary outcomes were SSI and anastomotic dehiscence within 30 days after surgery. Results In all, 565 patients were included in the analysis, with 288 in the MBP plus placebo group (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-74] years; 190 males [66.0%]) and 277 in the MOABP group (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-75] years; 158 males [57.0%]). Patients in the MOABP group experienced fewer overall postoperative complications (median [IQR] Comprehensive Complication Index, 0 [0-8.66] vs 8.66 [0-20.92]; Wilcoxon effect size, 0.146; P &lt; .001), fewer SSIs (23 patients [8.3%] vs 48 patients [16.7%]; odds ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27-0.77]), and fewer anastomotic dehiscences (16 patients [5.8%] vs 39 patients [13.5%]; odds ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.21-0.72]) compared with patients in the MBP plus placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that MOABP reduced overall postoperative complications as well as rates of SSIs and anastomotic dehiscences in patients undergoing elective rectal resection compared with MBP plus placebo. Based on these findings, MOABP should be considered as standard treatment in patients undergoing elective rectal resection. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281667

Study on the Necessary of Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Large Bowel Surgery

The effect of preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in paediatric bowel surgery on postoperative wound related complications: A meta‐analysis

Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Bowel Preparation Before Vaginal Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Pelvic Floor Disorders

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Colorectal Surgery in Enhanced Recovery Programs: Discrepancy Between the American and European Guidelines.

[Bowel preparation before colorectal surgery]

[Advantage and Disadvantage of Preoperative Bowel Preparation Before Colorectal Surgery].

Exploration of an Improved Bowel Preparation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary to reduce surgical site infection following colon surgery? Protocol for a multicentre Canadian randomized controlled trial

Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery-A Single Center Observational Study

Real-word Evaluation of Differences in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between the Digestive and the Non-Digestive Physicians: A Retrospective Study

Mechanical Bowel Preparation versus No Preparation in Duhamel Procedure in Children with Hirschsprung's Disease

[Early Outcomes of Elective Surgery for Colon Cancer with Preoperative Mechanical Bowel Preparation: a Randomized Clinical Trial].

Randomized clinical trial of the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on faecal microflora in patients undergoing colonic cancer resection

Effectiveness of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: a Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

Efficacy of BianShi Moxibustion for bowel preparation study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Morbidity After Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Prior to Rectal Resection

Prospective study on the effects of mechanical bowel preparation under the enhanced recovery after surgery concept on electrolyte disturbances and functional recovery after robotic surgery for urologic tumors in older adults

Mechanical Bowel Preparation Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium as It Alters the Gut Microbiota Composition: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study

Comparison of Two Litre Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl Versus Four Litre Polyethylene Glycol As Preparation for Colonoscopy in Colon Disease: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Regime for Bowel Preparation in Patients Scheduled to Colonoscopy: Low-Residue Diet or Clear Liquid Diet? Evidence From Systematic Review With Power Analysis