Abstract:Young children‘s deontic reasoning has been abundantly addressed by developmental psychologist since Wason Selection Task was simplified to explore the development of children‘s reasoning ability. It has been found that children around 2 to 3 years of age can make different judgments toward violations in moral and conventional domains. In the mean while, researches on children‘s Theory of Mind development also boomed. These studies, to some extent, all seemed to support the domain specific theory of children‘s cognitive development. In a recent research by Liu, Fang, & Keller (2003), children‘s deontic reasoning was explored in conditional promises between mom and her child such as, ―if you dress yourself everyday this week, mom will take you to the zoo on Sunday‖. In their task with vignette, both mom and her child knew about the other‘s action before the contract was due. In Keller, Gummerum, Wang, & Lindsey (2004)‘s study, however, both sides in the contract had no idea what the other was doing during the contract period. The ignorant deontic reasoning paradigm of Keller et al (2004) was deemed to be simpler in procedure and related to children‘s theory of mind development, thus was used in combination with the rule content of morality and social conventions, affirmative or inhibitive, to explore young children‘s deontic reasoning and have a tap on the domain specificity of children‘s cognitive development. Ninety-six 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds (48 girls) were randomly selected from an ordinary kindergarten of Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, who was organized into three age groups: 3-year-olds, Mean age =4.03; 4-year-olds, Mean age =4.93; 5-year-olds, Mean age =5.94. They were tested individually by telling stories accompanied by illustrations. Results show that: 1) Similar developmental trends and role effects were found in preschoolers‘ deontic reasoning of both moral rule and conventional rules, that is, most preschoolers can detect the peer (the child protagonist in the story) violation in the contract, and percentages detecting mother‘s and bilateral violation increase with age. In particular, some of 4-year-olds detected mom‘s violation successfully, and even some of the 5-year-olds detected bilateral violation. 2) Under the paradigm of ignorant deontic reasoning, many 4-year-olds falsely reported that the protagonist violated the contract under the circumstances mother was the true violator, and many 6-year-olds falsely reported that mother violated the contract under the circumstances the protagonist was the true violator. 3) Though preschoolers‘ deontic reasoning of moral rules and conventional rules showed similar pattern, significant differences were observed between their reasoning about affirmative social rules and inhibitive social rules. 5- and 6-year-olds‘ detection of peer‘s violation in inhibitive moral rules is significantly lower (around 56%) than that in affirmative moral rules, whereas 6-year-olds‘ detection of mother‘s violation in bilateral violating situations in inhibitive moral rules is rather higher. 6-year-olds‘ deontic reasoning of conventional rules showed similar differences caused by affirmative or inhibitive rules. These findings excelled some conclusions of previous studies, and indicated both the generality across domains and the specificity within domains in preschoolers‘ deontic reasoning of moral and conventional rules.

Reasoning about Moral Dilemma from Ordinary and Vocational High School Students

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

On the Problem of "Moral Dilemma" and the Application of "Moral Dilemma Teaching Method" in Primary School Moral and Rule of Law Course——Taking "Tram Dilemma" as an Example

Study on real-life moral dilemmas among university students:Everyday morality perspective

Moral Reasoning of Chinese Accounting Students and Practitioners

Exploring the issue of a lack of cohesion in moral education: An empirical study in Chinese primary and secondary schools

Investigation on the Tendency of Moral Dilemma for Medical Students in Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Development of Preschoolers’ Deontic Reasoning in Moral and Conventional Domain

Deaf High School Students' Cognition of Moral and Non-moral Rules

The Current Situation of Undergraduate Nursing Students' Moral Awareness

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

Do Senior Secondary Students Possess the Moral Maturity to Negotiate Class Rules?

Exploration of Students’ Perception of Academic Misconduct: Do Individual Factors, Moral Philosophy, Behavioral Intention, and Judgment Matter?

Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White: Children Appreciate Reasoners Who Approach Moral Dilemmas With Humility

Moral Reasoning about Aggressive Behavior in Relation to Type of Aggression, Age and Gender in South Korean Pupils

Actor perspective and moral reasoning: Do levels of criminal thinking moderate this relationship among non‐criminals?

Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: Effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness

Morality in the mundane: Categorizing moral reasoning in real-life social situations

On Adolescents' Moral Disengagement and Its Relationship with Parenting Styles

School discipline in moral disarray

The Complexity of Moral Reasoning and Its Types