Jacques Derrida's Deconstruction and Qoheleth's "dialectics of Language"
LIANG Hui,YANG Li-qiu,HUANG Tian-hai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2006.06.019
2006-01-01
Abstract:Contemporary hermeneutics has largely focused itself on the interpretations of the Bible and the development of the biblical traditions in the context of postmodern cultural and critical discourses.Wisdom Literature,however,has long been marginalized in Kethuvim(The Writings) of the Hebrew Bible through insufficient attention on the part of many critics in the perspective of postmodern theories.This essay presents an analysis on the dialectical method used by the author of Ecclesiastes in the light of Jacques Derrida's theory of deconstruction.Qoheleth employed a new dichotomy(profit/debit) to deconstruct the old one(wisdom/folly),which was over-simplified and resulted in hidden prejudices.Rather than a deconstruction to the binary structure of wisdom theology,his new dialectics(profit/ultimate debit) offers once again the idea of an unstable meaning that can only be infinitely deferred.It corresponds to Jacques Derrida's idea of differance that meaning is always ″deferred″ to the point of an endless supplementarity by the play of signification.This essay is not interested in defining Qoheleth as a deconstructionist,but in suggesting that,if Derrida's deconstruction seeks to identify and undermine such logocentric paradigms as dichotomies,the idea of binary opposites,etc.,the dialectics of language of Ecclesiastes reveals an ultimate impasse of thought engendered by a rhetoric that always insinuates its own textual workings into the truth claims of philosophy or theology.There runs a theme of utopian longing for the textual free play which would finally break with the instituted wisdom of language. In a summary,when traditional wisdom becomes insufficient in describing the diversity and multitudes of real life,Qoheleth offers a deconstructing dialectics of language to rationalize human's relations with God and his acceptance of a self-contradictory world.