Accuracy of 2D and 3D Image Auto-Registration Used in Radiotherapy Positioning
袁珂,邓小武,陈立新,罗广文,孙文钊,靳光华,黄伯天,王石
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2014.15.001
2014-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the accuracy and efficiency of 2Dand 3DX-ray image auto-registration applied for guidance of radiation treatment positioning.METHODS:Rando phantoms of head-neck and chest-abdomen were used to simulate positioning displacement.Megavoltage digital radiograph(MVDR),kilovoltage digital radiograph(KVDR)and cone beam CT(CBCT)images were acquired with the EPID and X-ray volune imaging(XVI)installed in a linear accelerator,and registered with the planning digital reconstructed radiography(DRR)and CT images using automatic gray registration software.Registration accuracy and its confidence interval were then determined by comparing the measured position displacement with the preset value.The time consumption for image processing,including acquisition and registration,were analyzed as well.RESULTS:3Derror of auto-image-registration for the three kinds of modalities(ΔMVDR,ΔKVDR,ΔCBCT)in head-neck and chest-abdomen groups were(1.50±0.30)mm,(1.32±0.27)mm,(1.85±0.35)mm and(3.21±0.89)mm,(2.07±0.53)mm,(1.95±0.64)mm.The 95% CI of registration errors were 1.18(0.87-2.05)mm,1.07(0.79-1.86)mm,1.38(1.16-2.54)mm and 3.49(1.47-4.96)mm,2.09(1.02-3.11)mm,2.51(0.70-3.21)mm for the above grouping.The average time used for each of the three kinds of image-guidance processing were(525±173)s,(346±162)s and(620±180)s.Among the three tested registration techniques,KVDR had the smallest registration error window and the fastest speed of image acquisition and registration.CONLUSIONS:More than 1mm error exits in the tested 2Dand 3DX-ray image auto-registration;this can affect the accuracy of precise radiotherapy,while the registration accuracy and efficiency of KVDR are the best in the three image modalities.Pre-evaluation is needed for selecting appropriate imaging and auto-registration technique according to clinical requirements.