Abstract:BackgroundThe health and safety climate of workplace has an important impact on the physical and mental health of workers. There is no available scale for the evaluation of workplace health and safety climate in China at present.ObjectiveThis study aims to sinicize and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Health and Safety Climate Survey.MethodsThe English version of Health and Safety Climate Survey was translated to Chinese and back-translated to English, and followed by expert evaluation to develop a Chinese version. Quota sampling method was used to select 2600 employees from 16 enterprises and public institutions in Pudong New Area of Shanghai and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale. Structural validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were included in validity evaluation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test structural validity. In EFA, an acceptable factor loading of items on their respective dimensions was > 0.60. In CFA, an acceptable root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), a standard absolute fitness index, was < 0.05. Comparative fit index (CFI) and parsimony-adjusted non-normed fit index (PNFI), measures of incremental improvement and fit, > 0.90 indicated a good fit. Convergent validity was evaluated by average variance extracted (AVE), and an AVE > 0.50 indicated good convergent validity. Discriminant validity was determined as good by the square root of AVE greater than the correlation coefficient between latent variables. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scale; the internal consistency considered was very good with an α > 0.90. Cronbach’s α coefficient may cause underestimation of reliability in the case of error correlation. Therefore, composite reliability (CR) calculated based on structural equation model >0.70 indicated that the CR was good.ResultsThe response rate was 95.69%. The Chinese version of Health and Safety Climate Survey included 22 items belonging to six dimensions which was extracted by the EFA, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 74.79%. The corrected RMSEA was 0.045, the PNFI was 0.970, and the CFI was 0.975 in the CFA, indicating good fit. The dimensional AVE values were all greater than 0.50, indicating good CV. The square root of AVE was greater than the correlation coefficient between latent variables, indicating good DV. The Cronbach’s α was 0.90 for the total scale and were above 0.70 for all dimensions. The CR was 0.93 for the total scale and were above 0.70 for all dimensions, indicating that the overall reliability of the scale was good.ConclusionThe Chinese version of Health and Safety Climate Survey has good reliability and validity, and can be further improved in field application.

Reliability and Validity of the Public Assessment Scale on Meteorological Service of Heat Emergency

Study on Assessment System of Atmospheric Environmental Security

Validity and Reliability of an Assessment Scale for Bacteria Food Poisoning Alarming Service

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and Validity of Health and Safety Climate Survey

Th e Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Emotion ality Scale among Civil Servants

Reliability and validity of Questionnaire on Health Status Assessment

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Reliability and validity of the self-reporting questionnaire for assessing mental health applied in Wenchuan earthquake

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Validation Study Of The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (Saq) In Public Hospitals Of Heilongjiang Province, China

Development and Validation of the Coping Capacity Measurement Scale of Public Health Emergencies in China

Reliability and Validity Assessment of Chinese Hospital Patient Experience and Satisfaction Monitoring Scale

[Reliability and Validity of Professional Quality of Life Scale among Government Staff in Earthquake - Stricken Areas in China].

Developing and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Brief Adolescent Respiratory System Health Assessment Scale-Student Version in a Chinese Sample

Evaluation on Reliability and Validity of Chinese Walkable Environment Scale for Urban Community Residents

The development and validation of the Chinese safety climate scale using the item-response theory approach

Reliability and Validity of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale among Chinese Civil Servants

Psychometric Evaluation of the Union Physio-Psycho-Social Assessment Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version NASA-TLX and SWAT in Evaluating Mental Workload of Community Physicians

Developing and Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Brief Haze Weather Health Protection Behavior Assessment Scale-Adolescent Version (BHWHPBAS-AV)